Climate Justice and Adaptation Measures

The most vulnerable groups to climate impacts are always the ones most protected through adaptation measures. Unfortunately, in today’s reality, this sentence is not true, and there is a long way to go to achieve that goal.

This article will explore why effective adaptation measures must always be just and inclusive, and present a case study of the Baltic Sea Region.

Written by

Contents

Adapted Adaptation Justice Index Framework, showcasing the dimensions that occur most often.

What are National Adaptation plans?

National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) were established in COP16 and implemented at COP17. Their aim is to identify climate risks and corresponding adaptation needs, while outlining strategies for implementing relevant adaptation measures. Countries are encouraged to share their documents with the UNFCCC Secretariat and the general public.

Share this article

Why do we need just adaptation strategies?

With the increasing occurrence of climate-related disasters caused by droughts, floods, storms and wildfires, the implementation of effective adaptation measures has become an important topic of discussion between policymakers. 

In this regard, many scholars highlight that there is a strong connection between inequalities and vulnerability to climate change. One example is that marginalised communities often live in areas that are more at risk of being affected by, for example, flooding, and thus resulting in a need for more protection. Similarly, not recognising the special needs of these groups may also cause maladaptation, therefore, artificially putting them in increasingly greater danger in case of an emergency.

On the other hand, wealthier communities often live in more secluded and secure spaces. Furthermore, in many places around the world, these groups possess monetary resources and political connections that guarantee them better protection against any type of climate disaster. 

These examples showcase that the meaning of the concept of just climate adaptation measures varies depending on the context. It can be applied to different scales (local, regional and global), and relate to different types of inequalities (racial, religious, socio-economic and more).

Case Study of the Baltic Sea Region

Why is the Baltic Sea Region relevant to be examined?

Most importantly, it is a very unique space with one of the most vulnerable and climate-impacted marine systems in the world. The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission (HELCOM) is one of the main intergovernmental organisations in the region, which has focused on environmental issues since 1974. According to their reports, the Baltic Sea is already facing many climate-related challenges connected to the rise in water temperature, increasing sea levels, and the occurrence of less intense winters.

As a consequence of these changes, many areas in the region will become high-risk to live in due to, for instance, predicted high precipitation. These types of disasters have already increased in occurrence, as can be exemplified by the flooding in Poland in Autumn 2024. Therefore, with the increasing risks and need for resilience building, it is also key that policymakers think about making those measures equitable and targeted at vulnerable groups.

Climate Justice in National Adaptation Plans

Taking into account the knowledge about these high risks of climate change-related disasters and the importance of coordinated, just adaptation policies, what does the research show about the reality in the Baltic Sea Region?

My analysis was based on the Adaptation Justice Index framework, which allows us to look at climate justice in adaptation strategies from four perspectives: distributive, procedural, recognition and restorative. Per each dimension, there are several indicators provided, and depending on the extent of how just were the actions taken by the countries, a score from 0 to 3 is provided per indicator.

Distributive justice

Distributive justice refers to whether citizens have equal access to opportunities that would allow them to avoid climate hazards. For example, one indicator from this category could be whether or not a risk assessment was performed. There were 4 indicators in this category, meaning that countries could score from 0 to 12 points overall. The main findings were as follows:

Graph of scoring per country for the distributive justice category in the Adaptation Justice Index
Scoring per country for the distributive justice category in the Adaptation Justice Index, based on data collected by the author of this article.

In the context of distributive justice, the Western/Nordic countries have significantly differentiated themselves from the Eastern/Post-Communist neighbours. The former have scored between 67% and 100%. On the other hand, the latter group have scored between 25% to 42% of all the possible points. Many of the national adaptation strategies lacked risk assessment, scarcely identified vulnerable groups, and did not take the distribution of negative impacts or benefits of adaptation measures into account.

Procedural justice

Procedural justice refers to the extent to which the planning process of the adaptation strategies is inclusive and allows for fair participation of various stakeholders. For instance, one of the indicators in this category was concerned with whether the Adaptation strategy details who participates in the planning process. There were 5 indicators in this category, resulting in countries being able to score a maximum of 15 points.

Scoring per country for procedural justice category in Adaptation Justice Index, based on data collected by the author of this article.

When it comes to procedural justice, there was no division as in the previous category, and the results were slightly higher, with the majority of the countries scoring over 60%. The analysis has shown that a lot of countries attempted to facilitate open, continuous consultations; however, the vulnerable groups (as defined by each country in their NAPs) were only invited in one case. Similarly, most of the governments highlighted that citizens will also be taking part in the process of implementation, while it was not the case regarding evaluation and updates.

Recognition justice

Recognition justice can be understood as ensuring that each of the societal groups, especially minorities, is recognised and their adaptation needs are taken into account. One example of the indicator in this category was whether the strategy acknowledges adaptation as a way to secure basic rights. There were 3 indicators in this dimension, thus the maximum score possible to obtain was 9 points.

Scoring per country for the recognition justice category in the Adaptation Justice Index, based on data collected by the author of this article.

The lowest scores were visible in the recognition justice category, with only one country, Sweden, scoring over 50%. Unfortunately, the examined adaptation plans did not acknowledge that there are varying adaptation needs in society, depending on vulnerability level, nor that it is affected by socio-economic power structures. Additionally, most Baltic countries do not recognise that the right to adaptation is a basic human right.

Overall scoring of the Baltic Sea Region

Overall, none of the Baltic Sea Region countries has scored over 70% as calculated per the Adaptation Justice Index. Even though the majority of the analysed NAPs were very comprehensive and complex, including opinions of experts on the topic, they nevertheless do not account for vulnerable groups and differences among the citizens of the countries. 

Scoring per country for all categories in the Adaptation Justice Index, based on data collected by the author of this article.

While it is possible that the differentiated adaptation needs are more recognised on the regional and local level in many of these cases, the national strategies should stand as examples of effective resilience-building measures, building strong fundamentals based on theories of climate justice. 

Therefore, the most important conclusion drawn from this article is that the national governments around the Baltic Sea Region, and Europe in general, should increase their efforts to create comprehensive NAPs that correctly identify the needs of the citizens and strategies to implement those measures. 

At the current moment, similarly to other UNFCCC processes, the lack of binding mechanisms and requirements disincentivises Parties from making efforts to submit the NAPs on time and consult relevant communities in the process.

How to change the current situation?

The analysis has proven that factors such as international debates, political ideologies of the ruling government and prominence of public discourse on climate all shape the extent to which climate justice is applied in adaptation measures. So how can young people get engaged and make an impact?

Firstly, the topic of (just) adaptation needs to be prioritised internationally and get the attention of global leaders. The finance gap between adaptation needs around the world and actual investments has been estimated at around US$187-359 billion per year. As this year’s COP finished with the commitment to triple adaptation finance and the adoption of a set of indicators measuring the adaptation progress, now is the perfect time for youth to advocate for the implementation and delivery of those promises. You can join panel discussions, campaign online and advocate to politicians, on a local, regional or global level.

Secondly, with the rise of far-right governments in Europe, it’s clear that the topic of climate change is becoming increasingly neglected. In addition to that, what comes with this new wave in politics is also discrimination against different vulnerable groups, such as migrants or LGBT communities. This can also strongly affect the implementation of the just adaptation measures. Therefore, it is essential that young people engage in advocacy networks, meet with their local representatives and participate in national elections.

Finally, connecting the two above-mentioned points, is the need to increase the importance of discourses on climate change in society. The engagement with international and national politicians will not bring any change until the majority of the population starts caring not only for the environment, but also for each other. With the increasing polarisation of society, we begin to treat each other with hostility and suspicion, losing the ability to feel empathy for each other.  

Therefore, what young people can do is to engage with their local community and spread awareness about the importance of climate justice and climate adaptation. In this way, you can contribute towards creating a powerful bottom-up movement whose demands will not be ignored by the state leaders.

Recent articles

, , ,

Climate Justice and Adaptation Measures

Call for Applications: YEE Youth Scientific Advisory Board 2025/2026

7-10 h/ month

Volunteering

remote

1 year mandate

Start December 2025

Join the YEE Youth Scientific Advisory Board (YSAB)!

Youth and Environment Europe (YEE) is looking for dedicated individuals to join our Youth Scientific Advisory Board (YSAB). As a member, you will play a crucial role in supporting YEE’s projects, campaigns, advocacy actions, and training programs by providing essential and up-to-date information on selected environmental and climate topics.

This position is remote, and requires 7-10 hours of work per month on average. The membership of the scientific board will run for 1 year (with possible extension). 

Application deadline: 23rd November 2025

Your responsibilities

  • ⚬ Provide scientific insights to ensure YEE’s actions, positions, and activities are aligned with the latest research.
  • ⚬Support the drafting of position papers to ensure YEE’s advocacy is backed by independent, youth-centred sources
  • ⚬ Contribute with data and resources for the development of handbooks, articles, and other educational materials.
  • ⚬ Help build capacity and raise awareness among young people on pressing environmental and climate issues.

What we offer

Candidates we are looking for

, ,

Call for Applications: YEE Youth Scientific Advisory Board 2025/2026

Who Pays for the Climate Crisis?

Understanding Climate Finance, debt, and reparations through Climate Justice lens

Practical information

  • When

    25th November 2025, 18 CET

  • Where

    Online

  • Fees

    Free

  • How

    Register

Co-organised with

Share

Who pays for the Climate Crisis?

The event will dive into the topic of climate finance and debt from the perspective of relations between Global North and Global South. The participants will not only understand the structure of international climate finance and adaptation financing, but also learn how to look at it through a climate justice lens.

Another objective is to challenge the fairness of international climate financing structures and the growing demand for climate reparations from the Global North to the Global South. We will also provide a short debrief on COP30.

Speakers

Dr. Ruth Carlitz

Ruth is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam. Her research focuses on the politics of public goods provision in low-income countries, from the perspectives of both governments and citizens. In addition to her academic research, Ruth has worked on studies commissioned by UN Women, Ladysmith, USAID, Twaweza, the International Budget Partnership, the World Bank, and other practice-oriented organisations. Ruth holds a PhD in Political Science from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Bachelor of Science in Economics from Duke University.

Elsa Kivinen

Elsa has been an active member of the local Finnish chapter of the Debt for Climate organisation since its inception in 2022. Her tasks have ranged from outreach communication and event organising to foster knowledge exchange about the topics of debt and colonialism for various interested groups. As the movement aims to bring a decolonial perspective to the questions of development, a strong portion of the outreach efforts is directed to countries that are directly impacted by colonially enforced debt crises or their consequences. I have been maintaining notable partnership efforts with the civil society in the DRC and Kenya.

Missed the webinar? Catch the recording now!

Other upcoming events

, ,

Who Pays for the Climate Crisis?

Call for a volunteer

Become an influential young leader.

4-7 h/ week

Northern Europe

Remote

Start ASAP

Contents

Share This Opportunity

Have questions?

For any questions regarding the selection process, contact hanna@yeenet.eu

 

YEE’s Membership Team is looking for 1 volunteer from Northern Europe to join the team!

YEE is missing our Regional Contact Person (RCP) for the North Region, and is looking for a dedicated person to fill the position! You will join a team of three other volunteers, YEE’s Membership Coordinator, and our board member on membership.

Please note that to be eligible for this position, you must reside in a Northern European country.

Your tasks will include:

  • 🟢 Collaborating closely with the membership team to plan, enhance and implement our member engagement strategy;
  • 🟢 Organising and chairing online members’ meetings on topics of interest;
  • 🟢 Staying updated on the member organisations in your region and give regular updates to relevant staff;
  • 🟢 Write articles about our members and topics they work on;
  • 🟢 Be a part of the Membership Committee and assess incoming applications to our network;
  • 🟢 Co-organise and host open meetings for organisations interested in joining YEE;
  • 🟢 Reaching out to and enhancing collaboration with youth movements in your region;
  • 🟢 Stimulating and supporting member engagement in YEE activities and projects.

______

YEE’s regional division of Europe is based on the UN geoscheme of Europe, but also including the Caucasus. The regions are consequently defined as follows:

East Region: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czechia,  Georgia, Hungary, Poland, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovakia, Ukraine.
North Region:  Åland Islands, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands,  Finland,  Iceland, Ireland, Isle of Man, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway,  Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
South Region:  Albania,  Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina,  Croatia, Cyprus, Gibraltar, Greece, Holy See, Italy, Malta,  Montenegro, North Macedonia, Portugal, San Marino, Serbia,  Slovenia, Spain, Türkiye.
West Region:  Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Liechtenstein,  Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, Switzerland.

About the YEE Membership Team

The Regional Contact Persons (RCPs) are an integral part of YEE’s Membership team, which actively works on engagement and collaboration with our members, and to expand our network and reach in the different regions of Europe. As an RCP, you will play a key role in strengthening YEE’s network by building meaningful relationships with Member Organisations (MOs), supporting their work, and encouraging collaboration across regions. This is a great opportunity to gain leadership experience, develop valuable skills in facilitation and networking, and contribute to youth-led environmental action on a larger scale.

About Regional Contact Persons (RCPs)

The RCP mandate is a volunteer position of a one-year term (March 2025 – March 2026).

All RCPs will report to and be supported by the Membership team (Membership Coordinator, Member Organisations Officer, Secretary General), and also be in contact with the rest of the YEE volunteers.

The role of the RCPs is to connect and develop communities of YEE’s member organisations on the regional level and work together to strengthen the connections of young people through YEE.

They act as the point of contact between YEE and the member organisations in their region, hosting meetings for the representatives of the member organisations, and linking them with any relevant projects and opportunities from YEE. They also work to strengthen YEE’s presence in and knowledge of their region, contributing invaluable information for our expanding network.

The average commitment of the position is between 4-7 hours a week, including bi-weekly meetings with the Membership Team, and bi-weekly meetings with other YEE volunteers, including the YEE Scientific Advisory Board, Liaison Officers, and relevant staff. These meetings will occur on alternating weeks so that you can expect at least one meeting weekly. 

What you will gain:

This volunteer position offers valuable insights into working for a large European network of youth-led environmental NGOs, as well as in-depth knowledge of relevant organisations and institutions in your region.

It also provides access to a network of young green activists and professionals and helps develop transferable skills such as time management, organisation, and communication, which can boost your CV.

Requirements

Equal Opportunity

YEE is committed to diversity and inclusion and strongly encourages applications from individuals of all backgrounds, including those from underrepresented groups.

, ,

Call for a volunteer

SB62 Unpacked

YEE’s experience on the international climate negotiations

Contents

Stephanny Ulivieri, Project Lead and COP30 Coordinator and Samira Ben Ali, Oceans Project Assistant in the New York Plenary Room in Bonn

Want to know more about the Global Just Transition Mechanism? Check out this short BAM explainer.

Picture from the intervention done by the Environmental NGOs (ENGO), one of the 9 official constituencies, during one of the JTWP negotiations
Picture of the meeting with Denise Dora in Bonn.
Meeting with Swiss Youth for Climate members, one of YEE’s member organisations!

Share this article

YEE’s first official delegation to SB62

Earlier this summer, Youth and Environment Europe (YEE) took an important step towards its COP30 preparation by joining the 62nd session of the Subsidiary Bodies (SB62) of the UNFCCC in Bonn with its first official in-person and online delegation to the international climate gathering. This marked a significant milestone in YEE’s advocacy journey this year, further cementing our presence in formal international climate negotiations.

Overview of the negotiations

While this was the first time YEE had attended the international climate gathering in person, it was also the first time we had a virtual delegation, which was both challenging and inspiring. As is often the case in the UNFCCC process, access to real negotiations remains limited for observers, and virtual participation was no exception. Most key negotiating sessions were closed to online observers, and even for the few that were open, technical issues such as platform lag made it difficult to join on time or follow them fully.

Still, following workshops and informal consultations gave more understanding into the process of upcoming COP negotiations and some hope for more productive and action-oriented discussions at Belém. The YEE online team closely followed discussions on gender and inclusion of Local Peoples and Indigenous Communities in the UNFCCC framework. A new Gender Action Plan (GAP) was being discussed, and the term intersectionality came up more frequently, signalling a positive shift in negotiation language. 

Gender and inclusion in climate policy

One of the notable developments was care work and gender-based violence being recognised, but Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) and inclusive language are still contested, with some countries restricting gender to biological sex. While constructive engagement continues, more work is needed before COP30 to secure an ambitious, actionable GAP with funding. Gender mainstreaming showcased uneven progress, while some adaptation references were made, a notable step back was observed in the agreed language. Overall, cautious optimism is warranted alongside ongoing advocacy to set gender justice in climate action.

Key issues raised included the recognition of people of African descent, the need for gender-disaggregated data, and broader calls for intersectional approaches. YOUNGO’s intervention emphasised that age must also be considered, especially when it comes to children, who remain largely invisible in climate finance frameworks.

It was encouraging to see these issues raised by multiple parties, reflecting growing awareness. At the same time, heated debates around the definition of gender showed that more work is needed, including from civil society, to keep challenging the stigma and push for broader acceptance of non-binary and inclusive gender identities in climate policy spaces. 

Just Transition Work Programme (JTWP) highlights

The on-the-ground delegation also closely followed the Just Transition Work Programme (JTWP) negotiations, which stood out as one of the silver lining elements of SB62. Despite limited progress across other negotiation streams, discussions under the JTWP signalled a growing openness to more rights-based, inclusive approaches that prioritise workers, frontline communities, and youth.

For YEE, this space offered meaningful entry points to push for climate justice through structured and ongoing engagement. But the fight is not yet over. Having left Bonn with a strong chairs’ note draft was just the beginning in order for us to obtain an ambitious decision later this year at COP30. Before that, in early September, the Fourth Dialogue under the United Arab Emirates just transition work programme will take place in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and it will focus on “Just energy transition pathways and holistic approaches to just transitions including socioeconomic, workforce, social protection and other dimensions, based on nationally defined development priorities“.

The messages and summaries arising out of the dialogue will be integrated into the existing draft text, thus essentially shaping what negotiators will be focusing on in Belém. And that is where our role will matter – holding the lines for negotiators to know that civil society needs a strong text to come out of it. For example, one of the main cross-constituency proposals is about the BAM (Belém Action Mechanism) for a Global Just Transition, concrete ideas on how to operationalise the JTWP and discuss actionable outcomes. 

Adaptation negotiations and global resilience

Negotiations on adaptation measures showed the balance between urgency and capacity, with parties emphasising that adaptation guidance to be based on practical experiences and lessons learned by implementing nations. There was also a call for better coherence among review processes like the Global Stocktake and the Methodology Panel. Persistent capacity constraints, especially among smaller delegations, were mentioned regarding the conduct of comprehensive reviews as early as 2027 or postponing them to 2028.

The discussions showcased the intention of pursuing a balanced approach to build collaboration, inclusivity, and actionable climate resilience strategies globally. Yet, there were missed opportunities, like no concrete agreement on further advancing National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) and some issues being postponed to SBI 63. Overall, while negotiations set foundations, NGOs and civil society expect faster, clearer commitments, stronger financial support, and implementation of more inclusive, ambitious adaptation to meet the urgency of climate impacts worldwide.

Beyond negotiations – youth-led advocacy and solidarity

Right at the beginning of the SBs, alongside partners from the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) and the World’s Youth for Climate Justice (WYCJ), the delegation co-hosted a side event on the right to a healthy environment. The discussion unpacked the international legal basis of this fundamental right, recent developments at the Council of Europe, and how youth can leverage these tools in their advocacy and litigation work.

The YEE delegation also attended and supported the second edition of the Bonn Climate Camp, a dynamic and inclusive space co-created by youth and civil society. It provided a much needed alternative to the often too sterile halls of conferences, with it becoming a space for dialogue, creativity, resistance, and deep connection, a reminder that our fights are not just about policy—they’re essentially about people.

On top of that, Bonn was a moment to meet some of our member organisations in person and to connect with other friends and allies, such as those part of the CAN-I Just Transition Working Group, and the members of the Human Rights and Climate Change Working Group, through which we had the chance to have bilaterals and meet with people such as Elisa Morguera, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Climate Change and Denise Dora, COP30 Special Envoy for Human Rights and Just Transition.

Looking ahead to COP30

Bonn was also a moment for solidarity and resistance. The YEE delegation joined protests in support of Palestine and stood by civil society against the censorship being imposed by the UNFCCC Secretariat. 

SB62 marked just the beginning of YEE’s presence in international climate negotiations in 2025, with COP30 on the horizon. Building on this experience, YEE managed to expand its policy engagement, strengthen partnerships, and support young people across its network to access and influence global climate spaces.

Showing up matters—and this first official presence at SB62 was a clear signal that YEE is ready to contribute with purpose, solidarity, and a deep commitment to youth-led climate action.

More articles about environmental decision-making

, , ,

SB62 Unpacked

Climate, Conflict, and The Global Power:

Rethinking Justice in an Age of Crisis

Practical information

  • When

    18th September 2025

  • Where

    Online

  • Fees

    Free

  • How

    Register by 15th September

Share This Event

Insights, Activism, and Justice Frameworks in Focus

This event will provide both theoretical and practical insights into the connection between climate change and armed conflict.

In the first part, it will explore different frameworks, as well as case studies. The second part will be more practical, as our guest speaker will share his own experiences as a climate justice activist.

Additionally, there will be an overview of climate justice movements and their analysis of fossil fuels’ relation to instability, armed conflicts and the unequal burdens of climate disasters. In addition to a detailed analysis and critical examination of climate justice entities’ discourses around climate & conflict.

Following these parts, we will have time for a Q&A session and an interactive discussion in the breakout rooms.

Speakers

Hassan Ali

Hassan Ali is a climate activist and independent climate security analyst. His work explores the links between climate change, armed conflict, and global power dynamics, with a focus on how media, activists and policy narratives shape public understanding of the climate-conflict nexus,, especially in conflict-affected and vulnerable regions. He also examines how historical and political factors influence climate policies and international responses.

Missed the webinar? Catch the recording now!

Other upcoming events

, ,

Rethinking Justice in an Age of Crisis

Call for Secretary-General

FULL Time (40h/week)

2955.8 EUR

remote possible

1 year contract

Start end of September 2025

We are seeking an individual with a deep commitment to our cause and a proven track record in strategic planning, project management, partnership building, and human resources. The ideal candidate will be under 35 years of age, proficient in English, and a resident in Europe, preferably with an EU working permit.

As Secretary General, you will be at the forefront of our mission, providing overall leadership and strategic oversight to ensure our values and goals in environmental advocacy, youth empowerment, and social justice are effectively pursued. Your responsibilities will encompass managerial oversight of the Secretariat, including staff recruitment and development, and acting as the main liaison with the Executive Board. You will also be crucial in financial and project management, fostering key partnerships, representing the organisation internationally, and securing vital structural grants.

We highly encourage all candidates based in the EU, irrespective of their nationality, to apply. Full remote working is possible, depending on being an EU citizen or non-EU. 

Work Arrangements

Contract period: A minimum of 12 months full-time (40 hours per week) employment contract with a strong prospect of prolonging. This role includes a 3-month provisional period.  

Remuneration: 73,150 CZK gross (approximately 2955.80 EUR) per month.

The selected candidate will be provided with an employee contract and typically will be required to pay their taxes in the Czech Republic, depending on their status. For more information please check the following website.

Essential Requirements

Applicants are eligible if they:

Application deadline: 18th August 2025

Your Responsibilities

  • ⚬ Lead the strategic planning process and ensure its implementation across departments and programmes; 
  • ⚬ Provide overall leadership and vision to ensure the NGO’s mission, values, and goals are effectively pursued; 
  • ⚬ Ensure the organisation complies with legal and regulatory requirements (e.g., membership fees, international cooperation, project reports and annual reports); 
  • ⚬ Ensure that the structures and processes within the organisation are kept under review and remain fit for purpose, especially in the light of organisational growth.
  • ⚬ Managerial oversight of the Secretariat, including recruitment, supervision, appraisal and motivation of staff and effective delegation;
  • ⚬ Act as the main liaison between the secretariat and the Executive Board
  • ⚬ Overseeing the integration and establishment of long-term engagement with the member organisations and effective servicing of the General Assembly, Executive Board and other governance bodies.
  • ⚬ Supervise staff and volunteers, ensuring a collaborative, safe, and productive work environment;
  • ⚬ Oversight of financial and project/programme management, working closely with the financial team.
  • ⚬ Represent the organisation at local, national, and international events, coalitions, and with partners or donors; 
  • ⚬ Act as a spokesperson and media contact when needed.
  • ⚬ Acquire and report for the existing structural grants for the organisation, namely from Erasmus+, European Youth Foundation and explore new opportunities  to secure further funding in this regard;
  • ⚬ Sign legal documents (e.g. grant agreements) and communication with the Ministry of Interior (e.g. regarding changes made to the composition of the organisation), as well as other legal entities; 
  • ⚬ Human resources management (Contracts, wages,  salaries and insurance, etc.); 
  • ⚬ Ensure that the external financial audits are on schedule and liaise with the internal auditors on the roadmap.

Ideal Profile

Extra Assets

Application Process

Interested candidates should fill in the application form by 18th August 2025.

Interviews will be held in the first weeks of September.

Equal Opportunity

We value diversity and have a strong commitment to a diverse work environment. In cases of equal competence, we give preference to candidates who contribute to this diverse work environment. 

, ,

Call for Secretary-General

YEE Statement in light of Genocide in Palestine and other human rights violations

The struggle for a livable planet is inseparable from the struggle for human rights and dignity. While our work focuses on climate and environmental advocacy, we cannot remain silent in the face of the ongoing genocide in Palestine.

We demand an end to the violence, accountability for those responsible, and justice and peace for all. Environmental and climate justice must be rooted in the broader fight for liberation, equality, and the right of all people to live free from oppression. We stand in solidarity with the people of Palestine.

We have joined countless civil society organisations and millions of people around the world in urgently calling for an immediate end to the atrocities in Gaza. Thousands of lives have been lost (many of them children) in what is an unimaginable humanitarian catastrophe.

Some examples of the calls we have endorsed/signed and that reflect our position:  

We also denounce the increasing censorship of Palestinian voices and its civil society supporters within international spaces, including the UNFCCC, where calls for justice and accountability at the SB62 Sessions have tried to be silenced under the guise of neutrality. We will not stand on the wrong side of history.

In parallel, we also condemn the coordinated attacks in the European Parliament during the European Youth Event (EYE) in June 2025, where the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO) faced coordinated attacks from right-wing MEPs and young right-wing groups. This included a demonstration outside the European Parliament by the youth wing of Identité Libertés and Rassemblement National Jeunes, actively supported by two sitting MEPs from the far-right Patriots alliance. YEE alongside the European Youth Forum (YFJ), FEMYSO and Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG) condemned these actions as part of a systematic campaign of intimidation and defamation, aiming to exclude and shrink the civic space of youth, in particular Muslim youth, from European spaces. 

At this critical moment, we reaffirm our unwavering commitment to justice, peace, and solidarity. The climate and environmental movement must not be neutral in the face of systemic violence, racism, and the erosion of human rights. Silence enables oppression; our advocacy must be intersectional.

We call on our peers, institutions, and allies across Europe and beyond to take a principled stand to challenge all forms of injustice, to protect civic space, and to defend the right of all young people, especially those from oppressed and racialised communities, to be heard, represented, and safe in democratic spaces.

Another world is not only possible, it is necessary. And we will not stop working for it.

Help us spread the word! Share this statement.

, , ,

YEE Statement in light of Genocide in Palestine and other human rights violations

Feedback for the upcoming EU Bioeconomy Strategy

By Youth and Environment Europe and co-signed by Generation Climate Europe

The European Commission launched the public consultation on 31 March 2025 for the upcoming EU Bioeconomy Strategy. The concept of bioeconomy encompasses biomass production, its conversion into food, bio-based materials, products, and bioenergy. This new strategy aims to advance innovation and maintain the EU’s leadership in the bioeconomy, while reinforcing circularity and sustainability and contributing to the decarbonisation of the EU economy. It will propose specific actions to unlock the potential of bioeconomy innovations, enabling them to reach the market and generate green jobs and growth. Stakeholders will be able to participate in the discussion and provide feedback until 23 June 2025 through the Have Your Say portal.

Bioeconomy Strategy (2018) – A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment

Our feedback was published on the portal of the European Commission.

Subtopics to include:

1. Support for Scaling Bio-Based Production

Enable companies – particularly SMEs – to scale up economically viable bio-based production by improving access to financial instruments and awareness-raising campaigns. Special attention should be given to strengthening biomaterial startups that rely on manufacturing capabilities, as they face significant barriers due to limited access to pilot facilities and industrial scaling hubs. Currently, many EU programmes continue to prioritize digital and tech-based innovation, while nature-based solutions remain underfunded and under-supported.

2. Establish Harmonised Standards and Certification

Develop clear, EU-wide standards for biodegradable and bio-based products. The current patchwork of complex and divergent standards across Member States undermines market uptake. Introduce a national or EU-level certification mark for raw materials produced in alignment with circular economy principles. A recognisable, trusted label would empower consumers and purchasers to make informed choices, increasing confidence and demand for sustainable materials.

3. Create Market Incentives for Circular Bio-Based Materials

Introduce economic incentives – such as reduced VAT rates – for circular, nature-based, or regenerated materials. These products often struggle to compete due to higher production costs. Furthermore, embed procurement incentives for state and EU-funded projects that prioritise materials aligned with circular and sustainable principles.

4. Align Biomass Production with Environmental and Food Security Goals

Establish clear eligibility criteria for farmers producing biomass for industrial use. These criteria must ensure that biomass production does not interfere with primary food production and respects the integrity of natural ecosystems.

5. Embed Bioeconomy Education and Training

Integrate bioeconomy education into school curricula and vocational training programmes, with a particular focus on creating opportunities in rural areas. This is essential to ensure that all young people – regardless of geography – can participate in and contribute to the bioeconomy.

6. Strengthen University-Industry Collaboration

Provide funding for university-industry training programmes, internships, and activities organised by student associations in relevant fields. These experiences are crucial for developing the next generation of bioeconomy professionals and innovators.

7. Improve Access to Jobs and Career Opportunities

Enhance digital platforms such as the Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy by integrating job-matching tools. A centralised, youth-friendly registry of job opportunities within the bioeconomy would make it easier for young people to enter and navigate this sector.

8. Promote Youth Participation and Leadership

Actively support youth engagement in bioeconomy innovation challenges, hackathons, and governance bodies. Young people should be recognised as key stakeholders whose ideas, energy, and leadership can help drive transformation.

9. Establish a Biomass Mass-Balancing Framework

Introduce a clear mass-balancing framework as part of the EU Bioeconomy Strategy. This would help industries transition toward more transparent and segregated biomass sourcing systems, ensuring traceability and sustainability.

10. Ensure Social Inclusion and Equity

To build a truly sustainable bioeconomy, social inclusion must be prioritised. Establish safeguards that define who is involved – such as workers, rural communities, and underrepresented groups – and how they are included in decision-making, benefit-sharing, and access to opportunities. Without this, the bioeconomy risks reinforcing existing inequalities.

11. Facilitate Youth Entrepreneurship in the Bioeconomy

Develop a clear and supportive regulatory framework that simplifies the process for young people to launch bioeconomy-related enterprises. Complement this with accessible mentorship programmes that offer hands-on guidance through each stage of business development, from idea to implementation.

Help us spread the word! Share this feedback.

Signatories

, , ,

Feedback for the upcoming EU Bioeconomy Strategy

Conclusion of the YEE Annual Meeting 2025

We are delighted to announce the successful conclusion of our Annual Meeting, held from 3-6 July 2025 in Prague. This event brought together our member organisations to discuss key issues, elect new leadership, and expand our network.

Overview

The Annual Meeting of the YEE network happened from Thursday, 3rd July to Sunday, 6th July 2025 in Prague and online. Out of 45 member organisations, 25 sent official delegates to discuss, vote and learn about important issues of the network. 

Apart from the official delegates, we also welcomed other delegates from the member organisations, candidates to the executive board, internal auditors and the YEE team, including the executive board, staff and volunteers. Overall, the Annual Meeting was attended by 62 people in Prague or remotely.

Changes to YEE Statutes and Rules of Procedure

The general assembly voted in favour of the presented changes to the YEE Statutes and Rules of Procedure. The most significant changes include:

All changes as amended can be found in the updated versions of the YEE Rules of Procedure and YEE Statutes.

Elections

Executive Board 2025-2027

The General Assembly has elected a new executive board for a two-year mandate (the length of the mandate was changed previously during the extraordinary annual meeting in February 2025). Out of 16 candidates, the General Assembly elected the following to represent them in the YEE executive board:

Internal Auditors

The General Assembly elected one new internal auditor, Ibrahim Tukur, from three candidates, who will play a crucial role in maintaining transparency and accountability within our organisation. 

The position of the second internal auditor has not been filled and therefore will be open before and voted on during an extraordinary annual meeting in early 2026.

Membership update

After the Annual Meeting, the YEE network now gathers 47 youth organisations from 23 countries.

New member organisations

We are excited to welcome two new member organisations to our network. 

The new members of the YEE network are:

The General Assembly did not approve of the new membership of one organisation – Vitality Association based in Moldova.

We look forward to a productive year ahead with our new board members, member organisations, and internal auditors!

, ,

Conclusion of the YEE Annual Meeting 2025