COP16 Results Explored:

Key Agreements and Missed Opportunities

Written by

Contents

Share this article

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal moment in the global effort to address biodiversity loss and safeguard the planet’s ecosystems. Building on the commitments made in previous conferences, this year’s outcomes sought to turn ambitious goals into actionable solutions. 

Parties to the convention were set to negotiate on key issues for the future of biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and equitable benefit-sharing. Securing funding for biodiversity was poised to be one of the most anticipated outcomes of this year’s COP. In addition, all eyes were set on countries’ National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP) submissions, as these documents are critical for assessing global progress toward halting biodiversity loss.

Let’s look at what COP16 delivered.

COP16 highlights

Indigenous people recognition

One of the largest successes of this 16th UN Biodiversity Conference is the historic adoption of a Program of Work and the establishment of a new permanent Subsidiary Body on Article (8)j to formally acknowledge the essential role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in biodiversity conservation efforts. This new body will serve as a platform to collaborate with Parties and other organisations, enabling the application and promotion of their traditional knowledge, innovations, and practices regarding biological diversity.

Additionally, addressing historical exclusions, an agreement was reached to recognise the contribution of Afro-descendant communities, rooted in traditional lifestyles, in implementing the Convention and supporting biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.

After more than three decades of persistent advocacy, these decisions marked a significant milestone for better inclusion and justice in decision-making, as it is the first time a UN environmental agreement has taken such a step

Financial resource mobilisation

Though parties agreed at COP15 to secure $200 billion annually by 2030 from all sources to support biodiversity initiatives worldwide, COP16 ended without much progress on this end. Unfortunately, only $163 million in new contributions were added to the already limited resources of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) Fund

The establishment of a new biodiversity fund was a major goal of this year’s COP presidency and developing countries. However, as COP16 drew to a close the dissatisfaction and distrust between countries became evident as no agreement was reached on this issue.

It is also concerning to see the prevalence of biodiversity credits at COP16. Despite the lacklustre results of carbon credits, some parties still push for further commodification of biodiversity. We must be very critical of these initiatives so as to not repeat the mistakes made with voluntary carbon credit markets and to mitigate the negative effects of neoliberal conservation policies. 

Biodiversity credits must not detract from the commitments from governments to secure biodiversity financing.

Measuring progress

Of the CBD’s 196 Parties, the majority (119) submitted national biodiversity targets,  policy measures and actions (NBSAPs) to reach the goals of the GBF. However, many countries have yet to submit their NBSAPs, which is the primary document that supports the implementation of the biodiversity targets. Accelerating action on this front is paramount to meet the GBF’s goal of halting biodiversity decline by 2030.

Need a reminder of what NBSAPs are?

Check out our article: The Road from COP CBD 15 to COP CBD 16

Negotiators reached an agreement (still to be adopted) on finer details related to the global review set to take place at COP17 and 19. This review aims to assess the progress made towards the main goal of the GBF based on NBSAPs and national targets. However, the agreement reached does not specify any action, besides reviewing their NBSAPs, that must be taken by countries after such a review. 

Cali fund

This historic agreement actualises the agreement made at COP15 to develop a global mechanism to share the benefits of using Digital Sequence Information on genetic resources (DSI) fairly and equitably. 

The Cali fund is designed to return some of the proceeds from the use of biodiversity back to protect and restore nature where these funds are needed most. It specifically targets large corporations and entities that derive commercial benefits from DSI. These enterprises are now bound to contribute a portion of the revenues derived from DSI to the Cali fund.

These resources will support the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF), with developing countries benefiting from it the most.

Civil society engagement at COP

Branded “COP of the People” by the Colombian government, CBD COP 16 fostered citizen engagement with the creation of a “Green Zone, a space open to all designed for hosting a large variety of activities including workshops, conferences and exhibitions. During the event, this platform welcomed about 700 000 visitors such as NGOs, business representatives, academics and local communities that were able to connect with peers, engage with other stakeholders, exchange knowledge and share their views on CBDs thematic issues. Youth participation was ensured with the presence of a dedicated Youth Pavilion, led by the Global Youth Biodiversity Network (GYBN), within the Green Zone. 

However, the separation between this area and the “Blue zone”, room for formal negotiations of the Parties and dialogues with accredited observers, was criticised, as the public was left wishing for greater connection with policy-makers and interconnection between the two main zones. 

Recognised as the largest CBD COP in number of participants, COP 16 nonetheless highlighted the need for strengthening the integration of civil society, including youth, in direct discussions with governments. 

Conclusion 

The outcomes of COP16 show both very encouraging progress and significant remaining challenges in addressing the biodiversity crisis. 

With the Cali fund and the official recognition of Indigenous people and local communities, groundbreaking steps were made toward better inclusion and equity in biodiversity governance. 

On the other hand, the incapacity of the Parties to reach an agreement on financial commitments and the limited accountability mechanisms signal the immense work still needed to meet the ambitious goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. “Making Peace with Nature”, the theme chosen by this year’s host country, will require core decisions from Member States in the follow-up meetings that will be held to address unresolved issues.

As youth, we remain committed to intensifying our efforts to hold leaders accountable and ensure that promises translate into tangible actions.

More articles about biodiversity

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal

Read More

Despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay.

Read More

While nighttime activities are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Read More

With the next conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (COP 16) right around the corner, let’s look back

Read More

Let’s first delve into how two of our member organisations UK Youth 4 Nature (UKY4N) and Jeugdbond voor Natuur en Milieu (JNM)

Read More
, ,

COP16 Results Explored:

Landmark adoption: First international soft law on youth and climate action

The first international soft law instrument on climate action and young people was officially adopted by the Committee of Minister! This is a Recommendation that has been in the drafting process for more than two years and comes after many years of the Advisory Council working to put climate and young people on the agenda of the CoE.

Historic news for the international community and more specifically for young people and climate action. The first international soft law instrument on climate action and young people was officially adopted by the Committee of Minister! This is a Recommendation that has been in the drafting process for more than two years and comes after many years of the Advisory Council working to put climate and young people on the agenda of the CoE. After hard negotiations in April 2024 during the 50th Joint Council meeting (CMJ), the CMJ agreed on the text. Then, on October 23rd this text with some last-minute amendments by the States, was officially adopted by the Committee of Ministers.

Youth and Environment Europe feels very proud to have played an active role in this process.
Our Secretary General Pegah Moulana was the Rapporteur of the drafting group for the past years and our Advocacy Manager, Agni (Agnes) Gkoutziamani, elected member of the Advisory Council on Youth of the CoE, has been the lead of the climate portfolio since January 2024 and represented the Advisory Council on Youth in the final negotiations processes in the CMJ meetings.

Key points mentioned in the recommendation:

Rights. The rights of young environmental defenders should be defended.
Participation. Young people should be able to participate in climate-related decision-making processes, and barriers to this engagement should be removed.
Education. Tailored climate resources should be provided for all education methodologies.
Health. Youth-friendly health services should be provided to young people experiencing health issues due to climate change.
Information. Member states should ensure full access to climate-related information and data
Discrimination. Member states should address all forms of discrimination young people experience in relation to the climate crisis and their activism.
Needs. When climate measures are implemented, the specific needs of young people should be considered (especially marginalised people etc).
Local dissemination. This should be translated, and shared, and the local and regional authorities should be invited to implement it.

We invite civil society and youth organisations to spread the word, disseminate the recommendation and its key points to your ministries, to the regional and local authorities and keep the recommendation relevant and alive, integrated into every aspect of your work. This is the moment to institutionalise the rights of young people in climate action.

We invite member states to respect the essential commitments they have made. We now look forward to seeing how the Council of Europe and member states will turn words into action,

Help us spread the word!

Landmark adoption: First international soft law on youth and climate action

The EU’s Deforestation Law: Why the delay matters

Despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay.

Written by

Contents

Share this article

Where do the products we consume in Europe really come from? Alarmingly, studies reveal that around 10% of EU consumption is linked to global deforestation, particularly in industries like palm oil and soy production. As we face the urgent threats of climate change and biodiversity loss, this issue cannot be ignored. In response, the European Union introduced the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which came into force on June 29, 2023.

What is the EUDR?

This landmark regulation is a significant step toward reducing global deforestation. The EU is addressing its responsibility as a major contributor to deforestation through the consumption of products like cattle, wood, cocoa, soy, palm oil, coffee, rubber, and their derivatives such as leather, chocolate, tyres, and furniture.

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is a key component of the EU Green Deal, specifically supporting its environmental and climate goals by addressing deforestation linked to global supply chains.

The EUDR seeks to ensure that these products, traded and consumed within the EU and globally, no longer contribute to deforestation and forest degradation. Companies dealing in these products are now required to perform due diligence, ensuring that the goods they sell in, or export from the EU are not sourced from land deforested or degraded after December 31, 2020.

However, despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay in its full implementation, which has drawn significant criticism from civil society. Originally set to take effect on December 30, 2024, the delay responds to concerns raised by international trading partners and industries, particularly during the UN General Assembly in New York.

What led to the delay?

Pressure from international trade partners and industries, especially those in countries like Indonesia and Malaysia – which produce 85% of the world’s palm oil – argue that the regulation is discriminatory and disproportionately affects small-scale farmers. Many smallholders lack the resources to comply with the EU’s new due diligence requirements. Critics note that the EU barely consulted external stakeholders before adopting the EUDR.

Yet, there is strong support for the EUDR among small-scale farmers in countries like Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. A coalition of over 120 civil society organizations and farmers’ groups representing more than 700,000 cocoa producers has backed the regulation. They see it as an opportunity to improve their livelihoods and promote sustainable supply chains. This support emphasises that, with adequate resources, small-scale farmers can meet the required standards, highlighting the importance of solidarity and EU assistance.

Why is the delay so serious?

Forests are vital carbon sinks, absorbing large amounts of CO₂ from the atmosphere. Current deforestation levels are dangerously high, threatening forests’ potential to act as carbon sinks. Every month of inaction allows for more forest destruction, worsening the climate crisis, accelerating the extinction of species dependent on these ecosystems, and violating Indigenous peoples’ rights.

For example, the Malaysian state of Sarawak is at high risk of being cleared for timber and oil palm plantations supplying international markets, with the EU being the third-largest destination for Malaysian palm oil exports.

The EUDR is essential not only to address environmental degradation but also to combat human rights and labor violations often associated with deforestation. The delay also disregards the efforts of companies and EU trading partners who have invested resources to comply with the EUDR on time. Many of these companies are striving to adopt sustainable practices, and the postponement undermines their initiatives. The delay also fails to protect vulnerable communities in the Global South who rely on threatened ecosystems for their livelihoods.

The EU’s global environmental commitments are also at stake. This isn’t the first time critical climate regulations have faced delays. The Fit for 55 climate package, aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 55% by 2030, and other key pieces of the European Green Deal have also encountered setbacks. Such delays raise doubts about the EU’s ability to achieve its long-term climate goals, threatening transparency and accountability.

What are the next steps?

The responsibility now lies with the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers to navigate international tensions and finalise the regulation’s implementation by 2025 through a formal vote. Further negotiations will likely involve compromises with trading partners and domestic industries, but it is crucial that the EUDR’s core environmental objectives remain intact.

There is also a crucial window of opportunity to support Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in the transition to sustainable supply chains. To prevent these countries from being left behind, the EU should increase financial and technical assistance, enabling LDCs to develop the necessary infrastructure and capacity to comply with the regulation, with a focus on supporting smallholder farmers. Most importantly, the EU must engage in continuous dialogue with LDC governments and stakeholders to address challenges and ensure a smooth, equitable transition.

What can you do?

Ensuring that the EUDR goes into full effect without further delay is essential to maintaining momentum in the fight against deforestation. As young citizens, we must ensure the EU remains committed to its environmental responsibilities. Here are some actions you can take:

  • 〇 Contact your Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and urge them to prioritise the swift implementation of the EUDR.
  • 〇 Support environmental campaigns and create or sign petitions.
  • 〇 Learn more about this issue
  • 〇 Raise awareness about the importance of deforestation laws, sharing information with others to keep the pressure on decision-makers.

The time for action is now. Together, we can demand a future that protects both the environment and people.

More articles about biodiversity

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal

Read More

Despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay.

Read More

While nighttime activities are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Read More

With the next conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (COP 16) right around the corner, let’s look back

Read More

Let’s first delve into how two of our member organisations UK Youth 4 Nature (UKY4N) and Jeugdbond voor Natuur en Milieu (JNM)

Read More
, ,

The EU’s Deforestation Law: Why the delay matters

Clean air after the AAQD, and now what?

Join Us for a Workshop on the EU’s New Ambient Air Quality Directive!

Practical information

  • When

    28th November and January 2025

  • Where

    Online and in Brussels

  • Fees

    Fully funded (for YEE Members)

  • How

    Sign up

Funded by

Related project

Share This Event

Have questions? Get in touch!

Why are we doing this

This October, the EU took a bold step by adopting the revised Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD), setting one of the most progressive air quality standards globally. Now, we’re bringing together young climate advocates to drive meaningful change across the EU!

What do we have planned?

Join us for two dynamic sessions—a virtual workshop and an in-person event in Brussels—where we’ll cover everything you need to know about the new AAQD and empower young voices for impactful advocacy.

Online Workshop

Date: 28th of November 2024
Time: 17:30 CET

In-Person Workshop

Date: POSTPONED to January 2025
Location: Brussels

What You’ll Gain

Travel and accommodation will be covered for participants from our Member Organisations

and reimbursed in accordance with our travel policy.

All participants are required to:

Other upcoming events

Clean air after the AAQD, and now what?

Youth Manifesto for Systemic Transformation in Textiles

This document is an invitation to rethink and act, setting ambitious goals for the textile sector that align with biodiversity and climate targets, guided by principles of justice, sustainability, and youth-led advocacy.

This manifesto, created by young advocates, calls for transformative change in the textile industry by 2050. It envisions a future where textiles contribute positively to environmental and social wellbeing through new principles focused on culture, production, and communication.

Core Themes:

  1. Textile Cultures: Moving towards a model of ownership based on reciprocity and transparency, rooted in sustainable practices and mutual respect across cultures.
  2. Textile Production: Emphasising circular, non-toxic processes, fair labour practices, and extended product life cycles to reduce waste and promote high-quality, sustainable products.
  3. Textile Communication: Advocating for transparent, honest, and inclusive communication that eliminates greenwashing and empowers consumers.

Background:

This manifesto emerged from the Youth Forum on Sustainable Fashion Consumption, supported by the UN Environment Programme and EU policymakers, underlining young people’s role in reshaping the textile narrative. It’s a call to action for policymakers, industry, and consumers to collaborate on a just transition.

Download the Full Manifesto

Help us spread the word! Share this manifesto:

Supported by:

, ,

Youth Manifesto for Systemic Transformation in Textiles

European Youth Demands for COP29

As European youth, we acknowledge our region’s historic responsibility for global emissions and call for urgent, just climate action. In solidarity with young people worldwide, we demand equitable policies that uphold human rights and amplify youth voices, reflecting our duty to a sustainable, inclusive future.

1. Mitigation

Position

If we hope to avoid the worst consequences of the climate crisis and protect the most vulnerable from consequences beyond finance and adaptation capabilities, mitigation needs to return to the centre stage of the UNFCCC process in order to keep global warming under 1.5°C. This means that the Sharm el-Sheikh mitigation ambition and implementation work programme needs to be strengthened to enable it to deliver on substantive outcomes in line with the mitigation relevant sections 20-42 of last year’s GST Decision 1/CMA.5 through technical dialogues and partnerships. It also means that all countries need to submit updated NDCs by early 2025 in line with the 1.5° target, including concrete roadmaps towards an implementation of 28/CMA.5.

Strategic Demands

  1. Sharm el-Sheikh Work Programme: We call on parties to review and improve the modalities of the Sharm el-Sheikh mitigation ambition and implementation work programme so as to guarantee that the implementation and continuation of the programme results in substantive outcomes on the decisions reached on mitigation action under 28/CMA.5, including the tripling of renewables, the doubling of the rate of energy efficiency improvements and the transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems. This can be achieved inter alia by having technical dialogues focused on sub-sections of 28/CMA.5, enabling funded mitigation action partnerships and placing high-level political messages on mitigation in the annual report and CMA decision at each COP session.
  2. Nationally Determined Contributions: we urge Parties to submit updated NDCs which are aligned with CMA.5 and with the 1.5°C degree goal of the Paris Agreement. The NDCs should include economy-wide reduction targets that cover all GHGs and sectors, aim for net zero latest by 2050, 2040 for industrialised economies, and are underpinned by concrete roadmaps for the implementation of 28/CMA.5.
  3. EU NDC: As Europeans, we specifically urge the EU and its member states to commit to an ambitious new EU NDC in line with the 1,5 degree temperature limit and aiming for net zero by 2040 to be developed in collaboration with civil society and especially youth, to be announced before SB62 in 2025. This updated NDC shall also include a roadmap for 28/CMA.5, which could become a reference point for others to do the same.
  4. Nature-based solutions: we urge Parties to develop nature-based solutions for national action plans and emphasise ecosystem restoration and conservation. Hereby, industrialised countries need to support the Global South. Safeguards to secure the achievement of climate and biodiversity benefits, in particular strengthening resilience, in the implementation of nature-based solutions for mitigation should be promoted and prioritised. These nature-based solutions should be implemented without compromising the diversity of ecosystems, including marine, forest and urban areas.
  5. Green skills: we ask Parties to commit to support and fund the development of green skills for young people, so as to place them at the centre of the just transition.
  6. We furthermore call for an improvement regarding the accessibility of funds and technologies to grassroots community projects on mitigation, working on patents and other barriers to transfer.
  7. Phase out fossil fuels: We call for the EU to be at the forefront of a global movement to phase out fossil fuels, without caveats such as “unabated” fossil fuel phaseouts. This means committing to an end of domestic use of coal by 2030, fossil gas by 2035, and oil by 2040. In line with 28/CMA.5, the goal of tripling renewable energy and doubling energy efficiency improvement rates globally needs to be reached as quickly as possible. To implement this, we urge the EU, its member states and other European nations to:
    • ○ shift fossil fuel subsidies to renewable energy by 2030 at the latest;
    • ○ endorse the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty (FFNPT) and encourage other countries to also sign; and
    • ○ commit to a time-bound phase-out of fossil fuels.
  8. Plants-based food systems: We call for a transition towards plant-based food systems supported by government subsidies and investment, emphasising the significant mitigation benefits of sustainable food reform in the light of the climate crisis – given that our global food system accounts for around one-third of GHG emissions – and recognising the need to tackle global food insecurity, environmental degradation, antibiotic resistance, and zoonotic diseases. In line with ProVeg International’s mission, we urge Parties to commit to replacing 50% of animal-based products with plant-based and cultivated foods by 2040.

2. Adaptation

Position

Adaptation measures must be prioritised alongside mitigation efforts, recognising both adaptation and mitigation as necessary in the climate actions of all member states to the UNFCCC. Given the urgency of climate impacts, especially in certain regions, it is essential to establish a differentiated adaptation regime that responds to specific local needs. We urge policymakers to reflect this equal prioritisation, ensuring adaptation receives commensurate attention, funding, and implementation focus alongside mitigation strategies.

Strategic Demands

  1. Progress under the UAE-Belém Work Programme with increased Specificity and Process Clarity: at COP29, Parties must collaborate to establish a coherent approach to achieve significant progress in the UAE-Belém work programme’s second year. Enhanced dialogue between negotiators and technical experts is essential to strengthen this workstream. Given the limited time at COP29 and over 5,000 adaptation indicators from various actors, we urge a streamlined approach to enable meaningful engagement and results.
  2. Means of Implementation (MoI): indicators under the Means of Implementation (MoI) need clear linkages to measurable targets, which currently remain a gap. 
  3. New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) Alignment: we advocate for alignment and integration between NCQG discussions and the UAE-Belém work programme’s methodologies. The NCQG must also consider adaptation’s evolving needs.
  4. Grants-based and locally appropriate adaptation finance: funding for adaptation needs to be grants-based, and locally appropriate and must prioritise the countries and communities that are most in need. This should be accomplished by improving access to funds for grassroots community projects with a long-term focus. Additionally, it should include advancements in technologies and best practices, as well as the removal of barriers like patents to ensure equitable technology transfer.
  5. Adaptation Fund: The 2023 fundraising campaign for the Adaptation Fund is likely to fall short of its expected $300 million for the second year in a row. This fund plays a vital role in directly supporting marginalised communities most impacted by climate change (MAPA). COP29 must prevent further funding deficits and ensure that the Adaptation Fund remains well-resourced to support its project portfolio and long-term sustainability.
  6. Support to National Adaptation Plans (NAPs): we call for robust technical and financial support for the development and transparent monitoring of National Adaptation Plans. NAPs should integrate disaster risk management strategies that protect natural ecosystems and prioritise stakeholder engagement, especially in ecosystem-based adaptation.
  7. Adaptation in Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): countries, particularly in the Global North, must integrate adaptation and loss and damage more comprehensively into their NDCs. While many developing countries have included adaptation elements, stronger commitments are required globally for coherent and balanced climate action.
  8. Inclusive, locally-led adaptation: adaptation projects must meaningfully involve local communities, ensuring fair wages, capacity building, and access to advanced technologies. Special attention must be given to developing countries and vulnerable populations, ensuring that adaptation builds local resilience and enhances livelihoods.
  9. Ecosystem and community-based resilience: all adaptation initiatives should focus on creating green spaces, improving air quality, enhancing sustainable transportation options, and ensuring access to clean water and nutritious food. These efforts not only build resilience to climate impacts but also contribute to overall community well-being and social cohesion. We call for significantly increased investment in clean energy infrastructure, sustainable transportation, and ecosystem restoration, recognising these as investments in future generations’ well-being. 
  10. Disaggregated data: we urge the use of age-, sex-, and disability-disaggregated data, along with child- and youth-specific indicators, in tracking adaptation outcomes under the UAE-Belem Work Programme. Experts must consider the unique needs of the most affected groups in formulating adaptation indicators.
  11. Climate mobility: National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) must recognise refugees from climate-vulnerable countries and prioritise climate-induced mobility, providing necessary protection and support for those displaced by climate impacts.

3. Loss and Damage

Position

There is a duty, particularly in the Global North and Parties in a position to do so, such as the EU, to provide adequate compensation for loss and damage to the most affected and vulnerable countries and communities. Funding for Loss and Damage initiatives should be adequate, equitable, additional and predictable, with a needs-based, rights-based and grant-based approach. 

Strategic Demands

  1. We urge Parties to establish a third pillar for Loss and Damage in Climate Finance – that is, to include Loss and Damage in the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG), including in the form of a (regularly reviewed and adjusted) sub-goal expressed exclusively as grants. 
  2. High-income countries, historical emitters and Parties in a position to do so must pledge new contributions to the Loss and Damage Fund. These should truly reflect their responsibility for the climate crisis and their economic capabilities to contribute and need to be new and additional to pre-existing funding under climate finance, humanitarian and developing funding. 
  3. Financial instruments used to provide climate finance must not exacerbate the debt burdens of developing nations. The quality of climate finance is as critical as its quantity.
  4. We encourage Parties to establish mechanisms to address systemic information gaps through qualitative and quantitative indicators of non-economic and economic impacts. 
  5. We recommend that Parties commit to ensuring transparency in the allocation of resources through mechanisms and robust monitoring.
  6. We urge Parties to recommend the establishment of mapping and data collection systems to analyse non-economic losses and damages in order to develop action plans at the country level. 
  7. The Loss and Damage Fund shall be operationalised according to the gender and human rights-based approach, giving adequate attention to economic and non-economic losses and damages.
  8. Issue guidance to the FRLD board to ensure adequate capitalisation of the Fund, access to funding for and meaningful participation in decision-making of Indigenous Peoples, frontline communities, local CSOs and groups experiencing marginalisation.
  9. Ensure rapid, grant-based capitalisation of the Fund to respond to economic and non-economic loss and damage, based on public finance, rights-based, regular, predictable, needs-driven, structured and accessible to vulnerable groups and communities such as youth and indigenous peoples.
  10. We urge Parties to agree on starting to disburse the Loss and Damage Fund by Early 2025.
  11. We call Parties to establish national focal points for loss and damage (LD) to improve coordination.

4. Climate Finance and NCQG

Position

Climate finance is central to meaningful action at COP29, particularly in advancing climate adaptation, mitigation, and addressing Loss and Damage. It is the key issue at the conference, as critical initiatives around the world remain underfunded, and developed countries have consistently failed to fulfil their commitments to provide sufficient financial resources to support vulnerable nations. 

The current global financial system has fallen short in mobilising the necessary resources to tackle the climate crisis. In light of Article 2.1(c) of the Paris Agreement, which calls for a transformation of the financial system to build resilient and sustainable economies, we assert that scaling up the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) is essential to addressing this imbalance. It is a collective responsibility to ensure that those who have contributed most to climate change—both in the public and private sectors—contribute accordingly.

To achieve this, climate finance must prioritise grants over loans, leverage public funding, and hold polluting industries accountable through taxes on their environmental impact. This approach will ensure that funding is more accessible and effective, driving the much-needed climate action to mitigate future risks and build resilient communities. It is of paramount importance to prevent interest rates that place most affected countries into heavier debt.

Additional sources of finance should be considered in this respect, most importantly, phasing out fossil fuel subsidies and their reallocation to just transition efforts, but also wealth tax, tax on financial transactions, windfall profit tax on fossil fuel companies, carbon levy on private jets and yachts, etc.

Strategic Demands

  1. Grants over loans: we demand the NCQG to prioritise grants over loans for climate finance, ensuring that public funds form the core of contributions to avoid deepening debt crises in most vulnerable and developing countries.
  2. Financing from polluters: climate finance contributions must be supplemented by taxes on polluting industries (such as fossil fuel companies), luxury goods, and services like private jets. Corporations must be held accountable through carbon taxes and special levies to fund climate action.
  3. Tax Justice, make polluters pay: we call for the recognition of the principles of tax justice and ‘polluter pays’ within the frame of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capacities (CBDR-RC). Developed countries should take the lead in reorienting their existing public finances to do no harm, and pursuing tax justice for new sources to be able to provide new and additional climate finance under the NCQG.
  4. $5 trillion climate debt repayment: the Global North must commit to a minimum $5 trillion annual climate debt repayment package, starting with at least $1 trillion in grants each year from COP29 onwards to cover adaptation, loss and damage, and a just transition. Private investments must not substitute this obligation.
  5. Direct access: funding must be directly accessible to vulnerable communities, cutting out intermediaries and simplifying processes, with special attention to local leaders and youth (both organised and unorganised entities) to empower them to lead green projects.
  6. Transparent and equitable finance: the NCQG must ensure transparent, additional funding for mitigation, adaptation, and Loss and Damage, with developed countries meeting existing commitments before broadening the donor base.
  7. The decision to adopt the NCQG must recognise the importance of funding across multilateral environmental agreements, including for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the Global Framework on Chemicals;
  8. Youth projects: we urge to facilitate access to finance for youth-led sustainable projects, including from multilateral institutions and funds as well as national resources to support NDC-aligned local projects.

5. Climate Justice

Position 

Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and long-term climate strategies must integrate just transition principles and social investments, including infrastructure, education, skills development, and social protection measures.

COP29 must prioritise a fair and inclusive approach, recognizing that communities most affected by the climate crisis are essential actors, not just victims, in addressing its impacts

Strategic Demands

We call for recognition and support of those facing the worst impacts:

  1. EU support in the context of just transition:  a robust inclusivity approach is crucial to enabling equitable climate solutions. The EU governments should ensure that climate policies are increasingly fair and inclusive to recognise evolving changes that arise as a result of the climate crisis. Particular attention shall be devoted to young people transitioning from education to work, workers, minority groups, and low-income populations.
    • ○ Just transition: European governments should implement support and retraining programs for workers transitioning out of fossil fuel industries, ensuring they are not disadvantaged during the renewable energy transition.. This is essential to maintaining fairness and social stability in climate policy.
    • ○ Support to low-income populations: European governments must implement climate solutions that avoid obligating low-income populations to disproportionately burdensome responsibilities.
  2. Engagement with the Global South: European governments should engage directly with minority and vulnerable communities in the Global South, ensuring their voices are heard in both national climate plans and at COP29. The Global South’s participation is vital in crafting equitable climate solutions.
  3. Inclusive participation
    • ○ At the national level: countries should involve a diversity of groups, including youth,  women, Indigenous Peoples, and people with disabilities in the development and implementation of national climate strategies. This should be done in close collaboration with the groups themselves, giving them the means to influence throughout the whole process, with a focus on empowering marginalised groups.
    • ○ In UNFCCC processes: we urge the UNFCCC to ensure meaningful and inclusive participation in negotiations and decision-making processes. This includes governments and corporations providing equal opportunities and ensuring that people from diverse socioeconomic and geographical backgrounds are heard, including youth, women, Indigenous People, and people with disabilities. We recognise that all voices must count equally to achieve equitable and effective climate solutions.
  4. International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion:
    • ○ We urge States participating in the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion (ICJAO) on Climate Change oral proceedings to include witness testimonies from youth, indigenous communities and other marginalised groups in their oral statements. Their lived experiences are critical in shaping climate justice outcomes.
    • ○ We invite States to address the importance of intergenerational equity and respect for human rights in the face of climate change during their oral statements at the ICJ. We also encourage them to mention citizen-led initiatives for the ICJAO campaign, such as the witness stands and the ICJAO petition. 

6. Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE)

Position

In line with Action 55 of the UN Pact for the Future, we call on Parties to provide meaningful opportunities for the participation of non-state actors in the UNFCCC negotiations, including young people, local communities, women, trade unions, indigenous people, academia, etc. and ensure that the outcomes of these deliberations are feeding into the negotiations. We commend the recognition of youth in the UNFCCC process, including through the establishment of the Youth and Children Constituency (YOUNGO), the acknowledgement of the need to ensure meaningful youth participation, and representation in the Glasgow Climate Pact and Glasgow work programme on Action for Climate Empowerment as well as the establishment of the Children and Youth Pavilion and Youth Climate Champion. 

However, many Parties have still not involved youth as full stakeholders in the process both at the national and international levels. Youth inclusion is a two-way process, which requires both sides to develop the skills and willingness to collaborate meaningfully. 

Strategic Demands

  1. We call on Parties to involve youth as full stakeholders in national and international climate negotiations. This includes:
    • Mandatory youth inclusion in Party delegations.
    • Pre-sessional and on-site youth consultations.
    • Youth-led forums for dialogue with Parties, as set out in the Glasgow Work Programme on ACE.
    • Enhanced opportunities for youth to participate in technical dialogues and provide interventions.
    • Sponsorship and support for youth participation in UNFCCC processes.
  2. We urge Parties to not only focus on building the capacity of youth to engage in political processes but also to develop their own capacity to effectively collaborate with youth and vulnerable groups. This should include practical training for Party negotiators on inclusive decision-making processes.
  3. Mainstream ACE principles across workstreams: ACE principles—climate education, training, public awareness, and public participation—must be integrated across all UNFCCC workstreams. We demand that the NCQG agreement allocate specific finance for ACE to uphold the procedural rights of Environmental and Human Rights Defenders (ERHRDs) in climate action.

7. Civic Space, Human Rights and Conflict of Interest

Strategic Demands

  • There is no climate justice without human rights:
    1. The EU must lead in safeguarding human rights in climate processes while ensuring meaningful participation from civil society and frontline communities.
    2. Local activists must be protected and allowed safe participation in key climate fora such as COPs.
  • Civic space:
    1. The UNFCCC and Azerbaijani authorities must facilitate inclusive participation at COP29 by ensuring access, freedom of expression, and peaceful protest rights. Azerbaijan should guarantee civic space and establish a system for responding to threats to human rights during the event.
  • Conflict of interest:
    1. We call on the EU to push for a robust UNFCCC Accountability Framework to define and regulate conflicts of interest, to prevent undue corporate influence and ensure transparency in participant admissions.
    2. The UNFCCC Secretariat should stop inviting industry associations linked to polluting interests and strengthen guidelines to prevent the misuse of the COP brand by host countries.
    3. The Host Country Agreement as well as any contracts involving corporations and organisations granted (Green Zone) partner or exhibitor status should be published on the UNFCCC website.

8. Planetary Boundaries

Position

Only three planetary boundaries remain within the “safe operating space”: ocean acidification (which is already approaching its critical threshold), atmospheric aerosol loading, and stratospheric ozone depletion.

All other boundaries – such as climate change, biosphere integrity (biodiversity loss), land-system change, freshwater change, and biogeochemical flows – have been surpassed.

The interconnected nature of these planetary boundaries means that addressing individual challenges, like limiting global warming to 1.5°C, demands a collective and integrated approach. Tackling one issue without considering others risks destabilising the entire Earth system.

Strategic Demands

  1. The European Union must take bold action to strengthen its Nature Restoration Law, increasing its ambitions, and enforcing legally binding targets for restoring degraded ecosystems and halting biodiversity loss. This includes scaling up nature-based solutions, protecting critical habitats, and integrating biodiversity goals into all sectors of the economy. As past experience has shown, compromise in this area is not an option, as the sustainable growth of economies and the well-being of citizens are intrinsically linked to a healthy, thriving natural environment.
  2. The private sector must significantly scale up its financial and structural commitments to biodiversity protection, as the majority of current funding comes from governments, which are providing insufficient resources to meet the targets set in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Different types of instruments can be considered to improve investment in nature and biodiversity, like the debt-for-nature swap and green bonds. 
  3. Furthermore, governments and institutions should focus on the strengthening of Multilateral Development Banks transforming them into climate and nature banks. 
  4. The European Union should not delay the EU deforestation-free products regulation (EUDR), a flagship achievement of the Green Deal.

9. Health

Position

The climate crisis poses a significant threat to global health and well-being in the 21st century. As young Europeans, we are deeply concerned about the direct and indirect impacts of climate change on health, social systems, and overall quality of life.

Strategic Demands

To address these interconnected issues, we call on European Governments to include the following in their positions in the UNFCCC:

  1. Recognise the profound and interconnected impacts of the climate crisis on health, social systems, and well-being in their verbal and written statements in the UNFCCC context.
  2. Integrate climate considerations into all health policies and planning processes.
  3. Strengthen healthcare infrastructure to withstand climate-related disruptions.
  4. Increase investment in research on climate-health impacts and effective adaptation strategies, prioritising the needs of vulnerable populations in climate-health action plans.
  5. Promote sustainable practices in healthcare and other sectors to mitigate climate change.
  6. Enhance education and awareness about climate-health links, particularly among youth.
  7. Ensure youth representation in climate-health policy-making processes to address the long-term nature of these challenges.

Help us spread the word! Share this statement

Signatories

This position paper was developed within the Network of European Youth NGOs for Climate Action (NEYCA).

, ,

European Youth Demands for COP29