Czech-speaking researcher

10 working days (FTE) distributed unequally

30 000 CZK gross (in total)

remote, in Czechia

short-term contract

Start ASAP

Researcher for Participatory Methods in the “Energy Literacy for Youth (ELY)” Project

We are seeking a Czech-speaking researcher based in the Czech Republic to contribute to the ELY project’s implementation and evaluation in Czechia.

This position is remote, and requires 10 days of work (full-time equivalent) in total until the 31st March 2025.

Background

The “Energy Literacy for Youth (ELY)” project is a 31-month capacity-building initiative funded by ERASMUS+. Its aim is to empower young people to become active citizens in addressing climate change and promoting renewable energy solutions. By developing and testing an adaptable and replicable energy literacy curriculum through local trainings, the project focuses on reaching and engaging marginalized youth across diverse socio-cultural contexts in Poland, Czechia, Cyprus, Denmark, and Germany.

Objective of the Position

The researcher will play a key role in designing and conducting participatory research with marginalised youth in Czechia to inform and adapt the energy literacy curriculum to local socio-cultural contexts. This includes mapping various marginalised youth groups in Czechia, analysing their unique needs and barriers, and strategising which groups the project should prioritise for engagement to ensure inclusivity and impact.

Work Arrangements

  • Location: The researcher will be based in the Czech Republic, with travel to local training sites as needed. The work will be performed remotely within the country.
  • Reporting: The researcher will report to ELY’s Project Lead and YEE Education Department head.
  • Collaboration: The researcher will work closely with the ELY project team and local partners in Czechia.

Your responsibilities

  • ⚬ Identify and build relationships with marginalised youth groups and local stakeholders in Czechia.
  • ⚬ Organise a research event with local stakeholders
  • ⚬ Implement participatory research methods tailored to marginalised youth in Czechia
  • ⚬ Facilitate participatory research based on the developed research design to gather insights on local needs and barriers to energy literacy.
  • ⚬ Collect qualitative and quantitative data through participatory methods.
  • ⚬ Analyse data to identify key themes and actionable recommendations for adapting the energy literacy curriculum.
  • ⚬ Provide research findings to support the design and localisation of the energy literacy curriculum.
  • ⚬ Prepare a comprehensive report in English summarising research findings and their implications for the project.

Deliverables

Candidates we are looking for

Extra assets

Application Process

Interested candidates should submit the form to be considered for the position. Applications should be sent by 12 January 2025. Early applications are encouraged as the position may close once a suitable candidate is identified.

Equal Opportunity

The ELY project is committed to diversity and inclusion and strongly encourages applications from individuals of all backgrounds, including those from underrepresented groups.

Application deadline: 12th January 2025
, , , ,

Czech-speaking researcher​

What does inclusivity in communication really mean for organisations?

#VoiceItRight

Inclusive language shapes how we connect, collaborate, and take action. Yet, it’s often overlooked or taken for granted. What does inclusivity in communication really mean for organisations? To find out, we reached out to diverse groups within and beyond the climate movement. Their insights reveal best practices, challenges, and ways to amplify marginalised voices for stronger, more equitable action.

POLITICS4HER

Politics4Her is an intersectional feminist youth-led NGO advocating for the inclusive participation of young women and girls in politics, civil society, and decision-making processes. Politics4Her is a movement driven by the belief that young women and girls hold the power to create a more equitable and just world. Their platform is a place where every girl and woman can be heard, valued, and recognised as an agent of change.

What is inclusive language to you?​

Politics4Her Europe believes that inclusive language is one of the many tools society has to create an environment where everyone feels seen, respected, and acknowledged, no matter their identity, background, or experiences. Our inclusive language avoids terms that might reinforce stereotypes, biases, or discrimination, and instead uses vocabulary that embraces diversity.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

At Politics4Her, we’ve developed comprehensive guidelines that emphasise the use of inclusive language across all levels of communication, both internal and external. These guidelines include recommendations for gender-neutral language. Additionally, our communication strategy focuses on respecting cultural diversity and neurodivergent individuals. In our campaigns, we also include content warnings (TW) for topics like sexual violence or mental health, allowing our audience to emotionally prepare before engaging with potentially distressing content.

What best practices and communication approaches can you share with other NGOs?

At Politics4Her, we’ve learned that effective communication isn’t just about sharing information—it’s about creating an environment where everyone feels heard, respected, and understood.

Based on our experience, here are some easy-to-follow tips:

– Avoid making assumptions about the values and cultural traditions of the person or group you’re engaging with. Take the time to understand the communities you work with and adapt your communication methods to align with their values, beliefs, and traditions.

– Use accessible language that avoids jargon and complex concepts. When working with multilingual and multicultural teams, it’s important to ensure the message is understandable for everyone, including those with varying levels of literacy or education.

CAN EUROPE

CAN Europe is a regional node of Climate Action Network, the world’s largest environmental network with over 1,700 Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) active in more than 130 countries, driving collective and sustainable action to fight the climate crisis and to achieve social and racial justice by convening and coordinating civil society at the UN climate talks and other international fora.

What is inclusive language to you?​

Inclusive language means using comprehensible words and expressions that embrace and include the diversity of all individuals, regardless of their gender, age, ethnicity, nationality, ability, religion, or any other characteristic. Using inclusive language in internal and external communications helps foster an environment free from stereotypes and assumptions and where individuals are able to participate fully. Our approach to inclusive language is rooted in principles of intersectionality, acknowledging how overlapping systems of oppression and discrimination shape individual experiences, and decoloniality, challenging colonial legacies in language and narratives.

Examples: Using inclusive language includes for example: avoiding unnecessary jargon, or abbreviations and acronyms, using clear and readable fonts, keeping sentences short and using open files, captions and accessible formats.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

A key example of how our commitment to inclusive language is reflected in our daily practices, is the ongoing development of an editorial style guide, which is designed to mainstream inclusive language throughout the organisation. The guide is also rooted in the mentioned principles of decoloniality and intersectionality, highlighting the importance of challenging colonial legacies in language, amplifying marginalised voices, and acknowledging the overlapping systems of oppression that shape individual experiences. This allows our approach to language to be not only inclusive but also transformative, contributing to a just and equitable transition where no one is left behind.

Can you share an example where language barriers impacted your ability to communicate with your audience?

Concretely, within the communications team we have drafted an action plan which includes a checklist on inclusive & intersectional communication. We aim to ensure that our content is accessible (using open files, captions, accessible formats). We also make sure to use inclusive images when communicating about climate, showing the realities of climate change in diverse communities. Finally, one of othe key areas of our communications strategy is to amplify marginalised voices and ensure that climate and energy policies are intersectional, inclusive and diverse.

How do you make complex environmental issues accessible to your audience?

We recognise that complex climate issues need to be communicated in a way that is accessible, engaging and actionable for our diverse audiences. Some in place strategies are the following: Simplifying without oversimplifying: We break down technical and policy-heavy topics into clear, concise messages while preserving the depth and nuance necessary to understand the issue. Tailor content for diverse formats: We recognise that our audiences might consume information differently, we try to adapt our content for various platforms, from detailed reports for policymakers to infographics, videos, and social media posts for broader audiences. We use short formats, avoid jargon and create graphics that make our content more attractive and easy to digest.

Our Instagram account is a good example of how we are trying to make our content more accessible, by using relatable language, real-life examples and adding a touch of humour or surprise.

Use of storytelling: We highlight human-centred narratives that make climate challenges and solutions relatable. We strive to make policies and processes relatable by highlighting local initiatives and success stories.

How do you ensure that the voices of marginalised communities are included?

Ensuring that the voices of marginalised communities are included is central to our work. One example is our collaboration with local members and partners to support coal-dependent communities in the Western Balkans during the transition to renewable energy. These communities often face significant economic and social challenges, making their perspectives critical to shaping fair and inclusive policies. We work closely with local organisations, such as environmental NGOs and grassroots groups. We also provide ongoing support to our local members, equipping them with resources and platforms to amplify these voices. Furthermore, we engage our members consistently, especially when promoting grassroots stories and highlighting local impacts.

Uniting Bridge

Uniting Bridge SNGO promotes non-formal education, cultural diversity, rural development, and youth inclusion, focusing on empowering vulnerable groups and creating opportunities for young people. It was inspired by the 2014 initiative “Come to Oshakan,” which highlighted the village’s natural and cultural assets while encouraging environmental awareness in rural communities. The organisation addresses social and economic barriers in the Aragatsotn region by implementing programmes and campaigns to challenge stereotypes and empower youth aged 14–30 across Armenia and beyond.

What is inclusive language to you?​

The organisation’s working language at local programs is Armenian, which is unique in that the language doesn’t have gender distinctions. That said pronouns and grammatical forms are universal for all genders. We are committed to ensuring that the organisation avoids using labelling or discriminatory expressions since the region where the organisation is located is home to communities of ethnic minorities. Additionally, the organization is currently implementing programs with displaced youth, and is important to extinct discriminatory language about them. Overall, by working with marginalised groups of youth, one of the organisation’s strategic goals is to create opportunities for these groups and to create a safe and inclusive environment for them.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

These are the main steps that our organisation uses in communication to promote inclusivity.

1. Armenian, as the main working language, avoids gender distinctions so that communication does not exclude or discriminate based on gender.

2. Avoid labelling expressions, particularly given the diverse ethnic communities in the region.

3. focusing on creating opportunities for marginalised youth and creating a safe environment for them.

Can you share an example where language barriers impacted your ability to communicate with your audience?

Unfortunately, our main beneficiaries often only speak their local language, which creates a barrier for them to participate in international programs and sometimes leaves their opinions excluded from mainstream youth movements. Sometimes it can be problematic even during the project application phase because of the complex questions and the need to write long answers or essays.

How do you make complex environmental issues accessible to your audience?

Since environmental problems in the region and the changes caused by climate change often create psychological pressure on young people, our organisation places importance on creating a safe and supportive environment during projects and training sessions. This encourages young people to express their fears and solutions openly and empathize with one another. During our last environmental program, we had a workshop about Eco-anxiety and explored some practices to help address these challenges. Currently, we are developing a package of environmental policies for the organisation that will play a role in the organization’s future work. This policy will guide not only our daily operations but also the design and implementation of our projects, ensuring that sustainability will be the core of our projects.

How do you ensure that the voices of marginalised communities are included?

Uniting Bridge SNGO located in Oshakan village mainly works with marginalised youth from rural areas. We work closely with local governments of the region to create opportunities for young people to take part in decision-making. One of our project’s aims is to create youth councils where young people can share their ideas and concerns directly with local leaders. We also organise capacity-building programs to give them the skills and confidence to take part in community decision-making processes.

For example, last year we had a project to support women in local government, helping them become stronger leaders for their communities. By connecting marginalised youth with local authorities, we help them feel included and ensure their voices are part of important decisions that affect their lives. This year we ran a project for the local and displaced youth and their parents. During the project, they closely work with the psychologist and have training for capacity building and their smooth engagement with the community.

Clear Global

CLEAR Global, formerly known as Translators without Borders, is a nonprofit organisation dedicated to breaking down language barriers to ensure that everyone, regardless of the language they speak, has access to critical information and the ability to express themselves. With a network of over 80,000 linguists and cutting-edge language technology solutions, CLEAR Global supports marginalised communities worldwide. The organisation focuses on developing multilingual tools, offering training for translators, and conducting research to enhance two-way communication in underserved languages, especially during crises.

What is inclusive language to you?​

For us there are two separate issues in inclusive language:

Language inclusion – the systematic efforts to reach speakers of all languages, including speakers of sign languages, and people who may have lower literacy. Efforts in this area might include mapping exercises to identify which languages are used by a certain group or in a certain area, and building monitoring systems to identify the extent to which speakers of minority languages are being included in programming, feedback systems, or communications.

Inclusive language – this would be attention to specific terminology within each language. It would include choosing terms carefully to make a clear positive statement about how an organisation welcomes diversity and using the preferred terms for different groups within society based on the preference of that group of people.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

Our organisation is focused on inclusive communications. We research how people access information, what types of phrasing and registers help them understand and trust what they read, what terms they use to discuss specific topics, and what are the power dynamics around language. We gather and share data so our partners can see maps of who speaks which language in the places where they work. We translate millions of words into hundreds of languages, and we build language and voice technology solutions to help people who speak marginalised languages get access to the information they need and be heard even when they might have low literacy.

What best practices and communication approaches can you share with other NGOs?

There are three areas that can help a lot. The first is to assume that many people accessing your information might be reading it in their second (or third, fourth, or fifth) language. So the simplicity and clarity of what you write should reflect that. Using plain language principles in your writing can reduce the comprehension effort for everyone and help you communicate more effectively. Even first-language speakers are likely to thank you for making a document easy to read.

The second point is that when you have made translated resources available, test them with your audience. Does it speak to people in the right way? Was the content clear? Did it sound too formal, or have stigmatising terms? And of course, don’t depend on the written word, try to make audio and pictorial content a standard part of your communication plan if you know literacy levels may be low for some people.

Can you share an example where language barriers impacted your ability to communicate with your audience?

Many of our conversations with communities are about unfamiliar concepts, so they often start with long conversations to understand how a concept can be discussed in that language. Essentially, they start with the exploration of a language barrier. How do you discuss ‘nutrients’ in Rohingya, or what does ‘vulnerability’ imply in this language? For different audiences, they will have precise meanings, but not always the same, and the words can carry different emotional content. Sometimes we bring experts together to discuss and agree on vocabulary for their sector – for example, how do you say ‘Safeguarding’ in Arabic. They will discuss the most precise term for the concept, but also the term most likely to be understood.

What challenges has your organisation faced in addressing language inclusivity, and how have you worked to overcome them?

People working in humanitarian emergencies often lack information about what languages are spoken in that context. Even local staff may be unaware of marginalised groups in the geographical area where they work. Our language data sets and maps help organizations plan their communications strategy to make sure they can get the most effective reach, or focus on the most marginalised groups. It also helps them monitor if they are achieving this.

We applied this approach with partners in the humanitarian response in northeast Nigeria. We worked with partners to gather and share the data on who speaks what languages were in the affected area. Then we built up translation communities to cover the top 9 languages. When we began the work, only about 31% of the population was getting life-saving information in their own language, while now, by adding just 9 more languages, we are supporting partners to reach over 80% of the community in their primary language. We are now applying this process to help get the best reach for climate warnings in Bolivia.

7Arte

7Arte is a cultural organisation based in Mitrovica, Kosovo, established in 2006 to empower youth, foster inclusivity, and promote sustainable development through arts and culture. With a mission to support Kosovar artists and advocate for cultural heritage, 7Arte creates and organises educational, artistic, and recreational spaces that inspire critical thinking, professional growth, and participation in decision-making. Dedicated to building a harmonious and inclusive society, the organisation integrates environmental stewardship and multiethnic collaboration into its diverse programs, shaping a vibrant, sustainable future for the region.

What is inclusive language to you?​

One of the most inclusive languages we use at 7Arte is English, recognised as an international language that bridges communication gaps across the globe. Its widespread use enables people from diverse backgrounds to connect, collaborate, and exchange ideas on a common platform.

However, as a language of expression, we turn to art. Art transcends barriers—be they cultural, linguistic, or social—and speaks a universal language that everyone can understand. Through various forms of artistic expression, such as movies, art installations, exhibitions, and video art, we address important issues and advocate for change. Art allows us to educate, inspire, and connect with individuals from all walks of life, creating shared spaces where ideas and emotions flow freely. Its ability to simplify complex topics, evoke empathy, and ignite conversations makes it one of the most powerful tools for communication, advocacy, and inclusion, regardless of where you are or who you are.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

Inclusivity is an important part in 7Arte, 7 Arte takes inclusivity with seriosity and sees it as a key priority. A great example of this is the Zana International Literature Festival, where we bring together artists from diverse communities—Albanians, Serbians, and even international participants. Their poems and writings are translated into three languages—Albanian, Serbian, and English—and published either as multilingual books or a single book featuring all three languages. This process not only ensures that the festival’s work reaches a wide audience but also promotes cultural exchange and mutual understanding. We also extend inclusivity to our other activities and communications.

Can you share an example where language barriers impacted your ability to communicate with your audience?

Language barriers are a challenge we continuously work to overcome. One example comes from the Visit Trepça Tour, where participants included individuals from various linguistic backgrounds. While we strive to accommodate everyone by offering live translation or multilingual support, there have been times when barriers still made it difficult to connect fully. To address this, we integrate inclusive methods into all our activities.

For example, during workshops under initiatives like 7 Arte on Wheels, we use art and movies as universal tools to convey messages without relying on language. Drawing, visual art, and other creative activities allow participants to express themselves and understand complex ideas in an inclusive way. In cases where language remains a need, local professors or school representatives often step in to help us ensure the message reaches everyone. While challenges remain, our focus on inclusivity in design and delivery ensures that we are always learning and improving.

How do you make complex environmental issues accessible to your audience?

At 7Arte, we believe that making environmental issues accessible starts with creativity and simplicity. Art is our go-to tool for breaking down these complex topics into something engaging and understandable. During the Green Festival, for example, we showcased visual and physical art installations that highlighted themes like sustainability and environmental protection. These installations transformed abstract issues into experiences that audiences could connect with on a personal level.

We also run hands-on workshops, especially for children, where participants create pictures, sculptures, and drawings inspired by environmental themes. These interactive sessions make learning fun and relatable, turning serious topics into creative exploration. Additionally, we host movie screenings on environmental themes that require no language skills, ensuring accessibility for everyone. By combining art, interaction, and visual storytelling, we help people of all ages and backgrounds understand and engage with environmental challenges.

How do you ensure that the voices of marginalised communities are included?

7Arte actively works to include the voices of marginalized communities through initiatives like 7 Arte on Wheels. This project engages students from underserved schools, including those in rural areas and minority groups such as Roma, Ashkali, Egyptian, and Serbian youth. Through activities like creating large posters, personal drawings, and other forms of art, participants express their unique perspectives and concerns.

These artworks are showcased in community spaces (mainly the school walls where the activity is held at), but also exhibitions happen from time to time with these artworks from time to time, giving visibility to their voices and fostering dialogue across diverse groups. By integrating these communities into our programs, we ensure representation, promote inclusion, and build bridges within Mitrovica’s multiethnic society.

Young Improvers for Youth Development

Young Improvers for Youth Development (YIYD) is a youth organisation based in Smolyan, Bulgaria, dedicated to empowering young people through inclusive and sustainable initiatives. We focus on engaging marginalised communities, promoting environmental education, and fostering social inclusion by creating opportunities for youth to actively participate in shaping their future. Through diverse projects and partnerships, we aim to build a stronger, more connected community where every voice is valued and heard.

What is inclusive language to you?​

At YIYD, inclusive language goes beyond simply choosing the right words—it’s about creating a culture of respect, belonging, and empowerment. For us, one of the most meaningful ways we embody this is by valuing and endorsing the use of the Rhodopean dialect of the Bulgarian language. Many of our volunteers speak this dialect, and it holds significant cultural and personal value for them. Unfortunately, the Rhodopean dialect is often met with prejudice, with some outsiders mocking or dismissing it as “incorrect” or “unpolished.” Such attitudes can alienate individuals, making them feel excluded or undervalued.

We actively work to counter this by celebrating the dialect as a vital part of our organizational identity and communication. We ensure that our projects, materials, and events are inclusive of the Rhodopean dialect and any other variations in accent or speech. By doing so, we create a safe space where everyone feels respected, regardless of how they speak. To us, inclusivity in language is about recognizing the beauty of diversity in expression, fostering acceptance, and breaking down barriers that hinder connection and collaboration. By endorsing the Rhodopean dialect, we send a clear message: no one should be excluded or judged for the way they express themselves. Instead, we celebrate the richness it brings to our work and the sense of pride it inspires in our volunteers and communities.

What steps has your organisation taken to promote inclusivity in communication?

At YIYD, promoting inclusivity in communication is central to how we connect with and empower communities. We believe that inclusive communication starts with breaking down barriers that prevent people from expressing themselves freely and being understood. Here are some of the key steps we’ve taken to ensure inclusivity: We actively encourage our volunteers and community members to speak in their natural dialects, including the Rhodopean dialect of Bulgarian. By normalising and celebrating the use of dialects, we challenge the stereotypes and biases often associated with regional speech patterns. This approach creates an environment where individuals feel proud of their linguistic heritage, rather than pressured to conform to a standard that doesn’t reflect their identity.

We prioritise engaging with elderly members of the community in their preferred style of communication, which often includes using traditional dialects and phrases. These dialogues not only respect and preserve their linguistic and cultural knowledge but also foster intergenerational understanding. Through these efforts, we emphasise that every voice, regardless of age or background, matters in shaping a more inclusive society.
Our events and campaigns are designed with inclusivity in mind.

Whether through multilingual materials, accessible formats, or embracing diverse speech styles in presentations, we ensure that no one feels excluded. We provide training for our team and volunteers to recognise and respect the diversity of speech, accents, and expressions. This helps to create a culture of sensitivity and openness that extends to all our interactions.
We use our platforms to showcase stories and contributions from individuals across different regions, dialects, and generations. By doing so, we highlight the unique perspectives and richness that diversity in language and communication brings to our work. YIYD fosters a sense of belonging and mutual respect, ensuring that everyone—regardless of how they speak or where they come from—can participate fully and meaningfully in our initiatives. For us, inclusivity in communication is not just a value; it is a practice that strengthens our communities and makes our mission more impactful.

Can you share an example where language barriers impacted your ability to communicate with your audience?

At YIYD, we’ve seen firsthand how language barriers can create challenges in communication and inclusion. One personal example that stands out is when Rahim, one of our key team members, faced challenges due to language differences in his interactions with our community members. Rahim is originally from a Pomak village in the Smolyan region, where the community primarily speaks Pomak, a dialect influenced by Turkish. When he joined our youth projects in Smolyan, he encountered difficulties in communicating with young people who spoke more standard Bulgarian. Despite his fluency in both languages, the nuances of Pomak, especially in informal settings, were often misunderstood. At times, he would find himself explaining his thoughts multiple times, as some of the expressions he used didn’t translate directly into Bulgarian.

One memorable instance occurred during a community meeting about an environmental project. Rahim was sharing ideas about sustainability with a group of youth from urban areas, but his dialect, rich with cultural references and expressions unique to his village, left some participants confused. They were not used to hearing such expressions, and Rahim noticed that a few of the young people were reluctant to ask for clarification, not wanting to appear uninformed. To address this, Rahim took the initiative to create more inclusive spaces where dialects like his own were embraced. He started incorporating bilingual communication, using both Pomak and Bulgarian terms to make the concepts more accessible. He also organised smaller discussions where young people could ask questions without feeling embarrassed, promoting an open dialogue where everyone’s language was valued. This experience highlighted the importance of inclusivity in language and communication. Rahim’s dedication to bridging the gap helped the community understand that language diversity should not be a barrier but an asset. It reinforced the value of respecting each person’s linguistic background and the role it plays in fostering stronger connections and a more inclusive environment.

By integrating dialects into our communication efforts, we’ve seen a transformation in the way young people from diverse backgrounds interact. For Rahim, this experience reinforced the power of language in creating a shared space where everyone can contribute, regardless of their dialect or accent.

How do you make complex environmental issues accessible to your audience?

At YIYD, we recognise that while we live in the heart of the mountains, many of us have lost a deep, personal connection with nature over time. This disconnection can make understanding and engaging with complex environmental issues feel abstract or overwhelming. To bridge this gap, we use a unique approach that ties modern environmental challenges to the cultural traditions and linguistic heritage of our region.

One of our key strategies is reviving forgotten traditions and words related to nature. By tapping into the rich cultural memory of our communities, we bring environmental concepts closer to people’s everyday lives and identities. 
The Rhodope region has many unique dialectal terms that describe elements of the natural world—specific types of weather, land formations, or traditional ecological practices. By incorporating these words into our environmental campaigns, we make the issues feel more relevant and rooted in local history.
We organize workshops and events that reintroduce traditional ways of living sustainably, such as crafting, foraging, or seasonal rituals tied to the land. These activities create a hands-on connection to the environment while showcasing how our ancestors lived in harmony with nature.
We share stories and folklore that highlight the relationship between people and the natural world. These narratives help audiences understand that caring for the environment isn’t a new or distant idea—it’s something embedded in our heritage.
We explain complex issues like climate change, biodiversity loss, or waste management by using analogies and examples drawn from rural life, farming traditions, or the rhythms of the mountain seasons. This makes scientific concepts feel more approachable and less intimidating.

By connecting modern environmental issues to traditions and language that resonate deeply with our audiences, we make these challenges not only understandable but also personally meaningful. This approach inspires people to view nature not as something separate but as an integral part of their lives and identities, motivating them to take action in ways that honor both their heritage and the planet.

How do you ensure that the voices of marginalised communities are included?

At YIYD, we are deeply committed to amplifying the voices of marginalised communities in the Rhodope region and ensuring they are heard, respected, and not judged in spaces where decisions that affect their lives are made. This is particularly important in places like municipal buildings and state institutions in Smolyan, where such voices are often underrepresented or dismissed due to biases related to dialect, social background, or perceived lack of formal education.

We actively support members of marginalised communities, including youth and elderly individuals from rural villages like Chepintsi, in presenting their concerns and ideas to local authorities. This involves organising meetings and providing guidance to help them articulate their needs confidently and clearly.

For example, we have worked with local residents to voice concerns about inadequate public services in rural areas at municipal council meetings in Smolyan. By accompanying and mentoring them through the process, we help ensure their contributions are taken seriously.
We advocate for a shift in attitudes within institutions to reduce stigma against people who speak in dialects or with distinct accents. Through our campaigns, we highlight the value of linguistic diversity, encouraging officials to focus on the content of what is being said rather than how it is said.
We use storytelling as a tool to connect marginalised voices with decision-makers. For instance, we’ve shared narratives of elderly residents describing the challenges of environmental degradation in the mountains, helping bridge the gap between their lived experiences and policy discussions. These stories have been presented at public forums to humanize the issues and foster empathy among officials.


Education is key to inclusion. We hold workshops on civic engagement, teaching marginalised groups about their rights and how to effectively advocate for change. These workshops emphasize that their voices matter and equip them with the tools to speak confidently in spaces like municipal hearings.

One of our most impactful moments was helping a group of volunteers from a small Rhodope village bring their concerns about waste management and pollution to the Smolyan municipality. These individuals, who initially felt hesitant due to their dialect and rural background, spoke powerfully about their experiences and successfully secured commitments for better waste collection services in their area. By creating opportunities for marginalized voices to be heard in the “highest places,” YIYD ensures that inclusivity is not just a principle but a practice that drives meaningful change in our local context.

, ,

What does inclusivity in communication really mean for organisations?

COP16 Results Explored:

Key Agreements and Missed Opportunities

Written by

Contents

Share this article

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal moment in the global effort to address biodiversity loss and safeguard the planet’s ecosystems. Building on the commitments made in previous conferences, this year’s outcomes sought to turn ambitious goals into actionable solutions. 

Parties to the convention were set to negotiate on key issues for the future of biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and equitable benefit-sharing. Securing funding for biodiversity was poised to be one of the most anticipated outcomes of this year’s COP. In addition, all eyes were set on countries’ National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAP) submissions, as these documents are critical for assessing global progress toward halting biodiversity loss.

Let’s look at what COP16 delivered.

COP16 highlights

Indigenous people recognition

One of the largest successes of this 16th UN Biodiversity Conference is the historic adoption of a Program of Work and the establishment of a new permanent Subsidiary Body on Article (8)j to formally acknowledge the essential role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in biodiversity conservation efforts. This new body will serve as a platform to collaborate with Parties and other organisations, enabling the application and promotion of their traditional knowledge, innovations, and practices regarding biological diversity.

Additionally, addressing historical exclusions, an agreement was reached to recognise the contribution of Afro-descendant communities, rooted in traditional lifestyles, in implementing the Convention and supporting biodiversity conservation and sustainable use.

After more than three decades of persistent advocacy, these decisions marked a significant milestone for better inclusion and justice in decision-making, as it is the first time a UN environmental agreement has taken such a step

Financial resource mobilisation

Though parties agreed at COP15 to secure $200 billion annually by 2030 from all sources to support biodiversity initiatives worldwide, COP16 ended without much progress on this end. Unfortunately, only $163 million in new contributions were added to the already limited resources of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) Fund

The establishment of a new biodiversity fund was a major goal of this year’s COP presidency and developing countries. However, as COP16 drew to a close the dissatisfaction and distrust between countries became evident as no agreement was reached on this issue.

It is also concerning to see the prevalence of biodiversity credits at COP16. Despite the lacklustre results of carbon credits, some parties still push for further commodification of biodiversity. We must be very critical of these initiatives so as to not repeat the mistakes made with voluntary carbon credit markets and to mitigate the negative effects of neoliberal conservation policies. 

Biodiversity credits must not detract from the commitments from governments to secure biodiversity financing.

Measuring progress

Of the CBD’s 196 Parties, the majority (119) submitted national biodiversity targets,  policy measures and actions (NBSAPs) to reach the goals of the GBF. However, many countries have yet to submit their NBSAPs, which is the primary document that supports the implementation of the biodiversity targets. Accelerating action on this front is paramount to meet the GBF’s goal of halting biodiversity decline by 2030.

Need a reminder of what NBSAPs are?

Check out our article: The Road from COP CBD 15 to COP CBD 16

Negotiators reached an agreement (still to be adopted) on finer details related to the global review set to take place at COP17 and 19. This review aims to assess the progress made towards the main goal of the GBF based on NBSAPs and national targets. However, the agreement reached does not specify any action, besides reviewing their NBSAPs, that must be taken by countries after such a review. 

Cali fund

This historic agreement actualises the agreement made at COP15 to develop a global mechanism to share the benefits of using Digital Sequence Information on genetic resources (DSI) fairly and equitably. 

The Cali fund is designed to return some of the proceeds from the use of biodiversity back to protect and restore nature where these funds are needed most. It specifically targets large corporations and entities that derive commercial benefits from DSI. These enterprises are now bound to contribute a portion of the revenues derived from DSI to the Cali fund.

These resources will support the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF), with developing countries benefiting from it the most.

Civil society engagement at COP

Branded “COP of the People” by the Colombian government, CBD COP 16 fostered citizen engagement with the creation of a “Green Zone, a space open to all designed for hosting a large variety of activities including workshops, conferences and exhibitions. During the event, this platform welcomed about 700 000 visitors such as NGOs, business representatives, academics and local communities that were able to connect with peers, engage with other stakeholders, exchange knowledge and share their views on CBDs thematic issues. Youth participation was ensured with the presence of a dedicated Youth Pavilion, led by the Global Youth Biodiversity Network (GYBN), within the Green Zone. 

However, the separation between this area and the “Blue zone”, room for formal negotiations of the Parties and dialogues with accredited observers, was criticised, as the public was left wishing for greater connection with policy-makers and interconnection between the two main zones. 

Recognised as the largest CBD COP in number of participants, COP 16 nonetheless highlighted the need for strengthening the integration of civil society, including youth, in direct discussions with governments. 

Conclusion 

The outcomes of COP16 show both very encouraging progress and significant remaining challenges in addressing the biodiversity crisis. 

With the Cali fund and the official recognition of Indigenous people and local communities, groundbreaking steps were made toward better inclusion and equity in biodiversity governance. 

On the other hand, the incapacity of the Parties to reach an agreement on financial commitments and the limited accountability mechanisms signal the immense work still needed to meet the ambitious goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework. “Making Peace with Nature”, the theme chosen by this year’s host country, will require core decisions from Member States in the follow-up meetings that will be held to address unresolved issues.

As youth, we remain committed to intensifying our efforts to hold leaders accountable and ensure that promises translate into tangible actions.

More articles about biodiversity

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal

Read More

Despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay.

Read More

While nighttime activities are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Read More

With the next conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (COP 16) right around the corner, let’s look back

Read More

Let’s first delve into how two of our member organisations UK Youth 4 Nature (UKY4N) and Jeugdbond voor Natuur en Milieu (JNM)

Read More
, , ,

COP16 Results Explored:

Clean air after the AAQD, and now what?

Join Us for a Workshop on the EU’s New Ambient Air Quality Directive!

Practical information

  • When

    28th November and January 2025

  • Where

    Online and in Brussels

  • Fees

    Fully funded (for YEE Members)

  • How

    Sign up

Funded by

Related project

Share This Event

Have questions? Get in touch!

Why are we doing this

This October, the EU took a bold step by adopting the revised Ambient Air Quality Directive (AAQD), setting one of the most progressive air quality standards globally. Now, we’re bringing together young climate advocates to drive meaningful change across the EU!

What do we have planned?

Join us for two dynamic sessions—a virtual workshop and an in-person event in Brussels—where we’ll cover everything you need to know about the new AAQD and empower young voices for impactful advocacy.

Online Workshop

Date: 28th of November 2024
Time: 17:30 CET

In-Person Workshop

Date: POSTPONED to January 2025
Location: Brussels

What You’ll Gain

Travel and accommodation will be covered for participants from our Member Organisations

and reimbursed in accordance with our travel policy.

All participants are required to:

, , ,

Clean air after the AAQD, and now what?

Youth Manifesto for Systemic Transformation in Textiles

This document is an invitation to rethink and act, setting ambitious goals for the textile sector that align with biodiversity and climate targets, guided by principles of justice, sustainability, and youth-led advocacy.

This manifesto, created by young advocates, calls for transformative change in the textile industry by 2050. It envisions a future where textiles contribute positively to environmental and social wellbeing through new principles focused on culture, production, and communication.

Core Themes:

  1. Textile Cultures: Moving towards a model of ownership based on reciprocity and transparency, rooted in sustainable practices and mutual respect across cultures.
  2. Textile Production: Emphasising circular, non-toxic processes, fair labour practices, and extended product life cycles to reduce waste and promote high-quality, sustainable products.
  3. Textile Communication: Advocating for transparent, honest, and inclusive communication that eliminates greenwashing and empowers consumers.

Background:

This manifesto emerged from the Youth Forum on Sustainable Fashion Consumption, supported by the UN Environment Programme and EU policymakers, underlining young people’s role in reshaping the textile narrative. It’s a call to action for policymakers, industry, and consumers to collaborate on a just transition.

Download the Full Manifesto

Help us spread the word! Share this manifesto:

Supported by:

, , ,

Youth Manifesto for Systemic Transformation in Textiles

Creatures of the dark

While nighttime activities are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Written by

Contents

Slow Loris
Whip Spider
Spanish Moon Moth

Share this article

For many people, Halloween is the one time of the year when being active at night is a must, whether to remember those who have passed or to celebrate the macabre and supernatural.

While nighttime activities like trick-or-treating, themed parties, and haunted house visits are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Why choose to be active at night?

For years, scientists have studied the advantages of nocturnality. A recent study now suggests that activity in darkness provides a survival advantage. This research points to four key survival benefits that helped nocturnal creatures outlast their daytime counterparts, especially during mass extinctions.

Let’s meet a few of these eerie night dwellers!

Adorable but deadly

We’ll start with arguably the cutest animal on this list. The Loris. As the common name, Slow Loris, for the species in the genus Nycticebus suggests, these beady-eyed mammals are not the fastest. But don’t be fooled by their harmless appearance as Lorises are the only venomous primates on the planet.

These dwellers of the night are specially adapted to life in the dark. Having large eyes increases their ability to capture light, improving night vision. When threatened, lorises use their bare patch that secretes oil, mixing it with saliva to create venom. Despite being really slow, these animals are skilled hunters using their slow pace to sneak up on unsuspecting prey. Truly giving new meaning to the saying “silent but deadly”.

A true creepy crawler

Now we move to a true creepy crawler, the whip spider. Despite what the name may suggest, these are not true spiders. Unlike true spiders in the order Araneae, whip spiders belong to the order Amblypygi. (See our previous article on why neither are insects!)

Whip spiders are, like their namesake, predators, hunting all kinds of arthropods. But unlike spiders, they do not possess silk glands for making webs. For this reason, they have developed an active hunting strategy. Using their modified legs, they sense prey items, once found they sprint towards them and grab the prey item with their spikey pedipalps. Witnessing this in action is sure to create an unsettling feeling in anyone. Whip spiders are found primarily in tropical to subtropical climates. They prefer moist dark places coming out to hunt when most of us are asleep. 

Endangered Beauty

For the third and final animal on our list, we stay in the realm of arthropods. Ever heard of the moon moth? Saturnia isabellae or Spanish moon moth is a moth in the large family called Saturniidae. Like most moths the Spanish moon moth flies during the night, searching for a partner or places to lay their eggs.

As the name suggests it is found in Spain, specifically the Pyrenees. What makes this species so special is that it lives in a relict population.

What is a relict (refuge) population?

A relict population is a remnant group of organisms that has survived in a restricted area after once being more widespread and diverse, often due to physical or climatic changes in its habitat.

During the last ice age, this species was more abundant, being well-adapted to the cold. However, as the climate changed it has been confined to all but the coldest parts of the Pyrenees. There its caterpillars feed on pine needles.

Having a restricted and fragmented range and with anthropogenic climate change further threatening its refuge habitat, means that this species is strictly protected under the EU Habitats directive.

So, this Halloween, when you’re out trick-or-treating or visiting a haunted house, remember at sundown all manner of mysterious creatures come alive. Keep your eyes peeled and who knows what you may come across.

More articles about biodiversity

The conclusion of the 16th meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP16) marks a pivotal

Read More

Despite the law’s importance in combating deforestation, the European Union recently announced a 12-month delay.

Read More

While nighttime activities are popular with humans for a few nights a year, some creatures keep it creepy all year round.

Read More

With the next conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (COP 16) right around the corner, let’s look back

Read More

Let’s first delve into how two of our member organisations UK Youth 4 Nature (UKY4N) and Jeugdbond voor Natuur en Milieu (JNM)

Read More
, , ,

Creatures of the dark

Personal stories on eco-anxiety

Short interviews with climate activists on their experience of eco-anxiety that will make you feel less alone.

Emilie

Tell us briefly about yourself and how you’re involved in climate action:

My name is Emilie, I’m 26 and from France. My involvement in climate action is through various youth organisations, including YEE, where I focus on informal education and raising awareness about environmental issues among young people.

What emotions come up for you when you think about the climate crisis?

I often feel frustrated, powerless, and angry at decision-makers for not taking enough effective action. I also experience guilt for not doing more personally, and I worry a lot about the future. Being around people who aren’t interested in the issue can feel lonely. Despite this, small positive changes give me moments of hope, and I’m inspired by activists who never give up.

Have you ever felt eco-anxiety? In what situation/s?

Yes, I did, especially after the European and French elections this year. I felt overwhelmed and depressed by the lack of political urgency on climate action and environmental protection. It has even affected some friendships with people who don’t fully understand how deeply I’m concerned about this issue. I also experience eco-anxiety when I hear about extreme climate events in the news, constantly wondering when we will be next.

What helps you cope with anxiety/these feelings?

Staying positive, and optimistic, and believing we can still improve things helps me cope. I rely on friends who understand and share my concerns. Humour and sarcasm (who hasn’t dreamed about frying under the sun in summer?!) also help me manage these feelings. Sometimes, just going outside, connecting with nature, or even taking deep breaths and putting things into perspective can really help.

Where do you find hope in your climate work?

I find hope in working with young people who are so determined, passionate and resourceful. They motivate me to keep going and remind me that positive change is still possible. Seeing younger generations become increasingly involved and concerned about climate issues also gives me hope for the future.

Hasmik

Tell us briefly about yourself and how you’re involved in climate action

Hasmik / Armenia/ Environmental Specialist

What emotions come up for you when you think about the climate crisis?

I often feel a mix of urgency and frustration when thinking about the climate crisis. The scale of environmental degradation creates a sense of helplessness, especially considering the lag in climate policy implementation. There’s also a degree of optimism,  connected to innovative strides being made in renewable energy, biodiversity conservation, and ecological restoration efforts. Balancing the catastrophic projections with potential solutions gives me a spectrum of emotions, from anxiety to hope in collective action. 

Have you ever felt eco-anxiety? In what situation/s?

Yes, eco-anxiety is something I have felt, especially when reflecting on very hot summers in Yerevan.  The city has extreme temperatures, and it’s hard to ignore the discomfort and health risks associated with these heat waves. Walking outside feels like entering an oven, and it becomes clear how unprepared urban areas are for this level of heat, with limited green spaces or cooling infrastructure. Another thing is winters without snow which is also a reminder of climate change. Yerevan used to have  more consistent snow cover, but in recent years, winters have been dry. This absence of snow changes the natural rhythm of the seasons. When you see these changes happening in your home city, it’s impossible not to feel a deep sense of worry about the future.

What helps you cope with anxiety/ these feelings?

In my last training, I took on the role of trainer and facilitator, focusing on the theme of creating positive nature future narratives. The goal was to shift participants’ perspectives toward imagining a hopeful and thriving ecological future, despite the overwhelming narratives of the climate crisis. Together, we explored how communities can engage in proactive, nature-focused projects that promote sustainability and environmental resilience. By the end of the session, we helped participants design a community project, emphasizing local action to restore ecosystems and biodiversity conservation. The process was energizing, allowing participants to share ideas of responsibility.

Where do you find hope in your climate work?

I find hope in my research job and as a youth worker through the creativity of young people. Their energy and innovative ideas inspire me, reminding me that the future is in capable hands. I also draw hope from seeing communities come together, even in small ways, to take action on environmental issues. Empowering youth for positive futures and giving them the tools to create change offers a sense of purpose. Seeing their growth, from awareness to action, I am sure my collective efforts can lead to impactful change.

Shogik

Tell us briefly about yourself and how you’re involved in climate action

Shoghik, Armenia. I am a Biologist currently doing research on the biodiversity of Ladybugs including invasive species and how human activity and climate change influence the spreading of them. Also I am involved in Uniting Bridge SNGO raising awareness among young people about civic activism and environmental action.

What emotions come up for you when you think about the climate crisis?

Mostly powerlessness, panic and worry, fear of uncertainty which I think is the worst. But I also think there are people that dedicate their knowledge and energy to act for change and then I feel hope.

Have you ever felt eco-anxiety? In what situation/s?

Yes, sometimes. Mostly when I read scientific papers related to biodiversity loss, climatic scenarios and endangered species, which I do a lot because of my profession.

What helps you cope with anxiety/ these feelings?

Some psychological tricks of being grounded and mindful in the moment, walking in nature help me stop overthinking. Talking to my friends and telling them about my feelings is also one of my coping mechanisms.

Where do you find hope in your climate work?

I do when I share my knowledge with youth. I always felt the gap between scientists and society. Now with my involvement in youth work and civic activism, each time I share the issues our planet is facing and the little conscious action that we can take in our daily lives, I feel empowered and hopeful.

Disclaimer

These interviews were conducted during a project called "Dealing with Eco-Anxiety". The project is supported by the European Youth Foundation.​

Do you have questions about your eco-emotions? We asked a certified psychologist and an eco-emotions expert to answer them for you!

If the distress over climate and environment starts to severely affect your daily functioning, please make sure to seek professional support. You can find a map which gathers helplines or support organisations for young people in all European countries at mentalhealtheurope.org

,

Personal stories on eco-anxiety

Deconstructing Internalised Discrimination in Climate Activism

#VoiceItRight

Share this article

Written by

Contents

Follow the #VoiceItRight campaign on

Climate activism has grown into a powerful global movement, uniting people from diverse backgrounds in the fight against environmental degradation. However, despite its inclusivity on the surface, the movement is not immune to deeper issues of internalised discrimination, particularly within its own ranks. 

Internalised discrimination refers to the unconscious acceptance of the dominant culture’s prejudices and stereotypes by marginalised individuals, often leading to self-limiting beliefs and actions

In the context of climate activism, this can manifest as the perpetuation of environmental racism, the marginalisation of non-Western perspectives, and the reinforcement of Eurocentric ideologies that fail to account for the diverse experiences and knowledge systems of affected communities.

Internalised discrimination in climate activism can have several detrimental effects:

  • It may lead to the exclusion of voices from the Global South, Indigenous communities, and other marginalised groups, whose experiences and traditional knowledge are crucial in crafting effective and just climate solutions. 
  • It can create a hierarchical structure within the movement that prioritises certain voices over others, often aligning with historical patterns of oppression and colonialism. This not only weakens the movement’s moral foundation but also undermines its effectiveness by disregarding comprehensive and culturally relevant solutions to climate challenges.

Key Issues

  1. Environmental Racism: Internalised discrimination often manifests through environmental racism, where the voices of marginalised communities, particularly those of colour, are sidelined or ignored in environmental advocacy. These communities are disproportionately affected by environmental hazards yet frequently excluded from decision-making processes. Addressing internalised discrimination requires acknowledging and actively countering this imbalance.
  2. Eurocentric Thinking: Climate activism, particularly in Western contexts, can be dominated by Eurocentric thinking that overlooks or undervalues the contributions and perspectives of non-Western cultures. This can lead to the imposition of solutions that are not suitable for all regions, particularly those in the Global South, where the impacts of climate change are most severe. Deconstructing this bias involves recognising the value of indigenous knowledge and practices, and integrating these into the global discourse on climate action.
  3. Bias and Representation: Activists from marginalised backgrounds may internalise negative stereotypes, leading to self-doubt or a belief that their perspectives are less valid. This can result in lower participation rates among these groups, reinforcing the dominance of more privileged voices. Combating this requires intentional strategies to uplift and empower underrepresented activists within the movement.

Strategies for Change

  • Education and Awareness: Raising awareness about internalised discrimination and its impact on the movement is a crucial first step. Educational initiatives should focus on helping activists recognise and address their own biases, as well as those embedded in the movement’s structures.
  • Inclusive Leadership: Promoting leadership roles for individuals from marginalised communities can help diversify perspectives and approaches within the movement. This can also provide role models for others, fostering a more inclusive environment.
  • Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Encouraging partnerships between activists from different cultural backgrounds can help break down Eurocentric barriers and foster a more global perspective on climate action. These collaborations should be based on mutual respect and a recognition of the unique contributions each group brings to the table.
  • Policy Advocacy: Advocating for policies that address environmental racism and promote equity in climate action is essential. This includes pushing for greater inclusion of marginalised communities in decision-making processes at all levels.

Deconstructing internalised discrimination within climate activism is essential for building a truly inclusive and effective movement. By addressing issues like environmental racism and Eurocentric thinking, and by promoting strategies for inclusive leadership and cross-cultural collaboration, we can ensure that the voices of all those affected by climate change are heard and valued. This not only strengthens the movement but also leads to more just and sustainable solutions to the global climate crisis.

More articles from the #VoiceItRight campaign

, , ,

Deconstructing Internalised Discrimination in Climate Activism

Overcoming barriers to inclusive language

#VoiceItRight

As we already mentioned, in the context of youth work and climate activism, language plays a pivotal role in shaping perceptions, influencing behaviour and reflecting values. Inclusive language ensures that climate activism is accessible and welcoming to all, regardless of background or identity. 

This is crucial to avoid bias, stereotypes or expressions that discriminate against groups of people based on race, gender, socioeconomic status, disability or other factors. 

Inclusive (intercultural) communication: is a transparent, truthful, accessible, and engaging communication that reflects the diversity of the society, promotes a climate of openness to intercultural encounters, and creates a shared sense of belonging.

Understanding barriers to inclusive language

If we want to foster inclusive language in our work for climate action it is important to recognise obstacles and barriers that can be hinder climate activism initiatives and inadvertently marginalise groups. In fact, many environmental terms were developed in context that did not prioritise inclusivity. For instance, the term “Developing countries” can be considered paternalistic. 

Lack of diversity within environmental movements and youth organisations can lead to the exclusion of voices and perspectives that could otherwise share best practices and useful approaches to foster inclusivity. 

By understanding and addressing these barriers we can foster communication that is equitable, accessible and truly representative of diverse perspectives. This awareness can help us to avoid language that can unintentionally exclude, alienate, or marginalise certain groups, perpetuating existing inequalities and limiting participation. A language that is inclusive and culturally sensitive serves as a tool for empowerment, fostering dialogue, and building inclusive movements that reflect the needs and contributions of all people.

Prevalence of technical language

The extensive use of jargon and technical language can make environmental issues seem inaccessible or irrelevant to those without a background in the field. In fact, too often scientists use the deceptively passive “neutral” language to explain climate change-related events to better reflect both scientific accuracy and the true gravity of the situation. 

At the same time, the media tend to follow the scientists’ lead, by adopting the so-called “neutral” language in order to avoid alarming anyone with any uncomfortable emotions. 

This has serious consequences, as it may limit the reach of activism’ initiatives. In fact, only people with certain knowledge on the topic or educational levels feel qualified to participate. 

Cultural and linguistic differences

Environmental activism often originates in contexts where the dominant cultural norms shape the discourse, potentially excluding those from different cultural backgrounds who may have unique perspectives on environmental issues. A core example of this is the role of indigenous communities, who are often at the forefront of environmental stewardship and yet could find their voices marginalised if the language used does not reflect their experiences. 

Western-centric approaches

Too often environmentalism has been shaped by and centred on western perspectives. This western-dominated approach typically emphases certain principles, practices and solutions that may not align with the environmental realities or cultural values of non-Western communities.

An example of this approach relies on the focus on conservation efforts like national parks or wildlife reserves, which are rooted in the idea of preserving “pristine” nature. Despite the good intentions behind these methods, they might hinder or even undermine the traditional ecological knowledge of indigenous and local communities who have been sustainably managing their environments for generations.

Another consistent difference is the tendency of framing environmental issues through a lens of individual responsibility. This includes reducing personal carbon footprints or adopting a sustainable lifestyle. Although these actions are important, they often do not consider structural inequalities that disproportionately affect non-Western and vulnerable groups. In fact, most communities in the Global South who contribute the least to global carbon emissions are the most affected by and suffer the most from the consequences of climate change. However, the dominant narrative may place undue emphasis on individual actions without addressing the larger, systemic forces driving environmental degradation.

Stereotypes

A certain use of language can perpetuate stereotypes and bias or fail to acknowledge systemic inequalities. This has the potential to alienate marginalised groups. For instance, framing environmental issues solely in terms of individual responsibility can overlook the disproportionate impact of environmental degradation on low-income and vulnerable communities, who may have less capacity to effect change through personal choices alone. As a consequence, feelings of exclusion or frustration can characterize those who feel that their struggles are not being adequately addressed. 

How to ensure inclusive (intercultural) communication

According to the Council of Europe guidelines, we can distinguish three key components of inclusive communication.

  • Accessibility for everyone
  • Representativity of the population
  • Narratives that favour openness to valuing diversity.

Accessibility

Everyone has access to – and ability to understand and feel targeted by – public communication and information that is needed to fully enjoy their rights. The words and images used, the communication channels, the language style and availability of the core information in several languages, are important features for inclusive communication.

In environmental activism it is crucial to keep a simple language in order to allow the message to come across and reach a larger audience. In fact, language barriers are a problem for English speakers all over the world, not just non-native speakers. As the majority of projects are conducted in a language not native to the participants and the audience, there will inevitably be language challenges.  Also, the discourse surrounding climate change is characterised by complex jargon, unclear definitions, and a constantly changing language.

Furthermore, equality has always to be taken into account: as societies are even more diverse and multicultural, it may be necessary to provide contents in different languages, by providing translations or subtitles. 

When having conversations about climate change, linguistic inclusiveness shouldn’t come last. It is critical that we spread the word about how crucial it is to include linguistic diversity in climate solutions. 

It is equally important to use gender-neutral language to describe a group of people in order to avoid generating a feeling of exclusion.  

Representativity

In the context of climate activism, it is essential to embrace pluralism in the environmental discourse, in order to incorporate a wide range of voices, particularly those from non-western and marginalised communities. 

A clear example are indigenous people, whose wisdom and customs to reduce the effects of climate change’s effects can be complementary to our competence to safeguard the planet. Furthermore, SDG17—partnership, which is at the centre of the Sustainable Development Goals—is also in jeopardy when there is a lack of inclusivity in the discourse.

Inclusive and alternative narratives

By ‘alternative narratives’ we intend pluralist, progressive, and human-rights-based communications of facts and commentaries in relation to phenomena which may be subjected to prejudice, stereotypes and hate speech. In this sense, alternative narratives are a form of constructive and inclusive communication, promoting critical thinking while avoiding a paternalistic or morally superior attitude. 

In the framework of climate action, the human rights-based approach is translated into the attention to how environmental issues disproportionately impact vulnerable communities. This leads to the use of a language that advocates for the rights and well-being of marginalised groups. 

By framing environmental issues within a human rights context, we can highlight the connections between environmental justice and social justice, ensuring that the movement addresses both environmental degradation and the inequalities that exacerbate it. 

Adopting alternative narratives means also avoiding paternalism and morally superior tone, by encouraging people to dialogue and questioning dominant narratives. This approach fosters a more collaborative and respectful movement where all participants feel valued and heard, without making them feel like they are being talked down to or excluded. 

The core point is to focus on building bridges and being mindful of how language can bring people together rather than alienate and divide them. By using inclusive and culturally sensitive language, we can avoid reinforcing existing prejudices and perpetuating stereotypes. 

More articles from the #VoiceItRight campaign

, , ,

Overcoming barriers to inclusive language

The impact of language on perceptions of climate change

#VoiceItRight

Share this article

Written by

Contents

Follow the #VoiceItRight campaign on

Language is more than just a means of communication; it’s the lens through which we view the world, shape our thoughts, and engage with each other. In the realm of climate activism, language serves as a powerful tool that can either unite or divide, empower or marginalise.

Imagine language as the thread that weaves the fabric of our collective consciousness. The words we choose can spark action, inspire hope, and bring about change. But they can also perpetuate stereotypes, alienate those who are already vulnerable, and reinforce existing power dynamics. This dual nature of language makes it a critical component in any social campaign, particularly one aimed at addressing the complexities of climate change.

Why do we need an inclusive language when talking about climate change?

When we talk about climate change, the language used often frames the issue in ways that are too technical, abstract, or detached from the lived realities of those most affected. Terms like “carbon footprint,” “mitigation,” and “adaptation” may resonate in policy circles, but they can feel distant or inaccessible to young people and marginalised communities. This disconnect is not just a barrier to understanding; it’s a barrier to action.

On the flip side, inclusive language invites participation and fosters a sense of ownership. For instance, using stories and experiences from marginalised communities can bring the abstract concept of climate change into sharp focus, making it relatable and urgent. Instead of merely talking about rising sea levels, we might share the story of a coastal community in the Global South that is losing its homes and heritage. Such narratives are not just informative; they are transformative.

The importance of language also extends to how we frame solutions. Eurocentric narratives often dominate the discourse, sidelining indigenous knowledge and local practices that have sustainably managed environments for centuries. By broadening our linguistic horizons and embracing diverse perspectives, we enrich the global conversation on climate action and ensure that solutions are culturally relevant and inclusive.

In youth work, the stakes are even higher. Young people are not just the leaders of tomorrow; they are the change-makers of today. The language we use with them can either empower them to take charge of their future or discourage them by making them feel excluded or unheard. Consider the difference between saying, “You are the future” versus “Your voice matters today.” The former, while well-meaning, places the burden of change on an undefined future, while the latter empowers youth to act now.

Language, Intersectionality, and Marginalised Youth

Intersectionality, a term coined by scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw, refers to the way different forms of discrimination—such as racism, sexism, and classism—intersect and create unique experiences of oppression for individuals, particularly those from marginalised groups.

The role of intersectional language in climate activism

In the context of climate activism, language plays a pivotal role in either highlighting or obscuring these intersecting identities and the challenges they face.

For marginalised youth, especially those from communities of colour, low-income backgrounds, or non-Western cultures, the impact of climate change is not just an environmental issue but a deeply personal one that intersects with issues of social justice, economic inequality, and historical oppression. The language used in climate discourse often fails to capture these complexities, instead presenting a one-size-fits-all narrative that overlooks the nuanced realities of these young people.

When climate activism ignores intersectionality, it risks alienating the very groups that are most affected by climate change. For example, discussions that focus solely on carbon emissions without considering how environmental degradation disproportionately impacts low-income communities can render the concerns of these groups invisible. Similarly, climate campaigns that centre Western perspectives may inadvertently marginalise indigenous knowledge systems and the voices of youth from the Global South.

Language that acknowledges intersectionality, on the other hand, can empower marginalised youth by validating their experiences and recognising the unique challenges they face. It opens up space for their voices to be heard, not just as victims of climate change, but as leaders in the movement for environmental justice. For instance, instead of framing climate action as a universal issue with a single solution, language that emphasises intersectionality would highlight the diverse strategies needed to address the different ways in which climate change affects various communities.

Moreover, inclusive language in climate activism can help build bridges between different social movements, fostering solidarity across issues of race, gender, and class. By recognising that the fight against climate change is also a fight against systemic inequality, activists can create more holistic and effective strategies that resonate with a broader range of youth.

For marginalised youth, whose identities are often shaped by multiple layers of discrimination, language that reflects intersectionality can be a powerful tool of empowerment. It can validate their experiences, amplify their voices, and place them at the centre of climate action, where they belong. In doing so, it not only strengthens the climate movement but also ensures that the solutions we create are just, inclusive, and sustainable.

More articles from the #VoiceItRight campaign

Language is more than just a means of communication; it’s the lens through which we view the world, shape our thoughts, and

Read More

Inclusive language ensures that climate activism is accessible and welcoming to all, regardless of background or identity. This is crucial to avoid

Read More

Inclusive language ensures that climate activism is accessible and welcoming to all, regardless of background or identity. This is crucial to avoid

Read More
, , ,

The impact of language on perceptions of climate change