Entries by YEE

,

Introducing Kacper | Showcasing the Unheard

I am amazed about activists and their passion and drive

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of YEE.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of YEE.

Contents

Learn more about the project

Share this article









Kacper Lubiewski is a 19-year-old Israeli-Polish climate activist living in Berlin. He started his activism in 2019, joining the climate movement in the same year. He is also a member of a housing activist group. For him, activism means working towards change and making a difference. He encourages those interested in activism to research their chosen cause, find a community, and take care of themselves to avoid burnout.

Tell us a bit about yourself. Who’s Kacper?

My name is Kacper Lubiewski, I’m an Israeli-Polish activist. I have been based in Poland for the majority of my life, but for a year now I’ve been living in Berlin. I’m 19, and the majority of the activism that I used to do and that I’m still doing is climate activism. Since I moved to Berlin I also started being active in a housing activist group.  

How did it all start for you?

It all started for me in 2019, so I have been active for four years now. I was 15 at the time and I attended a session of the European Youth Parliament (a great organisation by the way that I am recommending everyone to check out) and I met a lot of fantastic and motivated people there. This has really put me in a dilemma with what I am doing with my free time. I come from a village next to a small town in Poland called Opole and in my life I had this feeling that everything is sort of just omitting and getting by Opole and there’s nothing happening there. 

And 2019 was the time of Greta Thunberg and climate school strikes. I wanted to be part of it. I saw great potential in the movement, that was just getting started but seemed like a cause that I wanted to help with. So yeah, that was definitely one part of it, just being surrounded by and seeing for the first time a lot of people who are active, passionate and dedicated.

I realised that’s an important cause and I’m not going to let another great big thing just not happen and that’s how I started a local group of Fridays for Future in Opole and then I started working with the national and international movement. 

What does activism mean to you? 

I think that activism can be understood very broadly, as in this day and age there are just so many ways to be an activist.

“You can be a cyber activist, a street activist, you can be a spokesperson, you can do graphics, you can do some other type of art you can use to support your voice.”

There are so many different areas but I think what binds it all is the drive for change. And I think that activists realise that there is something wrong in the status quo, be it climate policy or the situation of the queer community. And then they sense this need for change there and they work towards it. 

I started being active in the climate movement just because I realised that this is purely a survival issue for the entire planet and the next generations on it. Sometimes it is a question of survival and knowing that this is the very last moment that we can do something about the climate catastrophe before we cross the tipping points.

What activities are you engaged in at the moment?

I’m still quite fresh in the housing movement. It’s only been a few months and I have dedicated most of my time to just learning and reading up on the issue. But when it comes to the climate movement, I’m proud of quite a few things. I feel like I and the rest of the people in my local group have effectively brought the climate movement to my city. We have organised dozens of different protests and we stayed vocal on a lot of issues. We have organised different types of protests, but I’m most proud of a very big march that we did there. 

That was around the time of COP26 in Scotland. I’m also proud of all the workshops that we’ve organised. Educating others has become such a big passion of mine and I have organized workshops on the different intersections of climate catastrophe with other issues, like the queer movement, or I talked about the comparison of Polish and German climate policy. 

I myself am Jewish, so I was very excited to see the intersection between the Jewish culture and the climate crisis. So I also led such workshops and I’m currently working as a climate educator in an online school. 

What kind of communities do you work with?

At this point in my life, I like to identify myself as an independent climate activist. I think that over those four years, I have worked with pretty much everyone that was there in Poland. For example the Rise for Future, Greenpeace, 350.org, with Extinction Rebellion, with everyone that was there that they considered the issue important.

Right now, I think I’m just supporting whatever causes I find necessary and interesting. When it comes to the housing movement, I’m part of a group called Right to the City, which is based in Berlin, part of a bigger campaign in Berlin called Deutsche Wohnen and Co Enteignen. We are an English-speaking group of immigrants in Berlin who try to give this unique perspective on the housing crisis from an immigrant’s perspective. 

What do you enjoy most about being an activist? 

What I enjoy the most is the beautiful community that it creates. I think that activism is just full of beautiful people with so much drive and passion for knowledge, for change, for growth. I have met my best friends there, people that are closest to my heart at this point. 

And I’m just utterly amazed by what they do and by their passion and drive. I think that being part of a group helps you feel that you’re not alone when faced with big issues like discrimination or climate catastrophe. And you feel like you’re part of something bigger and that in this collective, you can cooperate to work for a greater good. And I definitely felt very supported. I grew a lot. I feel that I am simply a better person through my activism. The community definitely plays the biggest part for me.

How would you go about engaging more diverse groups of people into activism?

When it comes to the right to the city, we’re an immigrants-based group and you would think that it naturally means the immigrant community in Berlin is diverse. That isn’t actually the reality that often, because even in those marginalised communities, the default is there are only the most privileged in that community. So we have a lot of Western Europeans in Berlin, a majority of the group is white. There are some people of color as well as Eastern Europeans, myself included. 

We are currently brainstorming how we can expand the representation in the group to people of lower income, perhaps to people that don’t speak English fluently and to more people of color. We need to improve our outreach and actively engage with those groups. 

In Fridays for Future, however, I think that the movement that we started with was diverse. We had people from big towns, small towns, a lot of women, a lot of queer people,  and I would even say people of very different cultural backgrounds. 

We have very much celebrated that diversity. It went like: “You come from a small town?” “How can we platform your voice and make sure that you’re heard?” so that it is not just the Warsaw voices that are being heard.

How has the climate movement changed since you joined in 2019?

It got better funded. It also got better organised, there are more people with more experience. People get better at what they do over time. It also got incredibly more diverse. 

There are lots of different initiatives, small, big, loosely connected, very tight communities with a lot of philosophy behind them for the elderly, or for young people, for the in-between… There’s just so much to choose from. 

It has also radicalised itself in a good way. I think that the climate movement has begun to start asking itself about questions of intersectionality of the voices of the people from the Global South. It has also definitely started looking more at the housing crisis and how homelessness intersects with the climate crisis.

What’s next for you?

I want to stay within the climate movement. I definitely want to go to different blockades. I want to help out other activists. I want to support them however I can. I don’t think that I want to get involved in a particular group at the moment. I definitely want to get deeper into housing though. 

“The reason why I got into the housing movement was because I experienced the housing crisis myself.”

I realised how cruel it is and that has really pushed me towards organising myself within that sphere. The campaign that I mentioned before will be pushing for another referendum in Berlin to expropriate the very big housing companies that own a great deal of Berlin’s housing. I definitely want to work within that campaign and collect the signatures and engage in outreach and education on that topic.

If you could send a message out to these people that are thinking of getting involved in activism?

Do it. I would say to everyone who wants to get involved in activism, do it. 

And research the cause that you want to get involved in. Knowledge is a great power and it makes your work a lot easier, better informed and a lot more nuanced. Find a cause that’s dear to you. It might be animal rights, queer issues, women’s rights, climate policy… I assure you that there’s something for you. I really do doubt that there are people who are just indifferent to the entirety of all politics.

Second would be to find a community. I always think it’s better to actually start working in a group and just get knowledge and develop bonds. I think that’s a wonderful way to get active. 

And then I would say to just not burn yourself out and to remember about your own needs and your own health. There are too many wonderful activists who just keep burning themselves out because they have too much to do.

“Remember that a burned out activist is a useless activist because that doesn’t help the cause in the long run. It’s an investment.”

It’s an investment towards the cause and it’s also healthy and respectful towards yourself to know where to stop and when to stop and when to come right back to it with bigger strength.

Other interviews


Saying goodbye is never easy | Farewell article

Saying goodbye is never easy | Farewell article

Picutres of Chloé

Perhaps one of the most meaningful ways YEE helps promote youth leadership is simply by being an entirely youth-led and independent organisation. Young people coming together to organise, fundraise, manage, learn…

Share This Post











As I’ve been recruiting for the new Strategic Communications Officer position, a candidate asked me: what were the highlights of working at YEE? Where do I start? From the first successful online webinar we hosted with the Advocacy Working Group in 2020 to the project proposals which got awarded funding to attending COP26 and COP27, there have been a few. 

In a similar line, another candidate asked me what my proudest moment was at YEE. For the handful of moments listed above, not only was I happy but I was, indeed, proud. Proud of the work we accomplished in the AWG and YEE in general. Proud of these young people dedicating their spare time, their energy and pouring love and hope into working to improve the environment. 

If I had to pick just one moment, it would be the time I spent at COP26 in Glasgow. It was the first time our team had met in person after months (over a year for me!) – possibly the most intense environment for us to start out in. It was the first time YEE had sent a full delegation to COP and it is an incredibly intense, intimidating space to be in. Surrounded by other environmental organisations, climate negotiators and diplomats we had only previously  seen in the news…  The impostor syndrome was real. It was physically demanding – from struggling to get into rooms at the venue to the daily commute between Edinburgh and Glasgow. But the whole team kept showing up, sticking to our policy goals and making the most of such an opportunity despite how exclusive the space felt. It was truly learning by doing. The lessons learnt in Glasgow brought us to Sharm el-Sheik for COP27 where we had a bigger delegation, strengthened ties and collaboration between European youth organisations and had our first on-site side event. Progress! 

Above all – it is a fight, a fight for environmental justice

This was clear at COP26: as young people, navigating in a political arena not built for us, one that does not recognise our expertise, is challenging. The concept of intergenerational justice is thrown around in the media and a few young faces have become posters for the anxiety and frustration and hope our generation holds… but the decision-making spaces still remain hard to penetrate.

 

YEE works tirelessly to try to get our foot in the door - from getting
young people onto the boards of ‘adult’ organisations, to helping bring
about roundtables with stakeholders, to showing up in daunting spaces
like the UNFCCC COPs.

 

Perhaps one of the most meaningful ways YEE helps promote youth leadership is simply by being an entirely youth-led and independent organisation. Young people coming together to organise, fundraise, manage, learn… I’ve often said, YEE is one of the best things that could have happened to me this early on in my career and tertiary education. I was given real responsibility and a real say in organisational discussions. At 19, I had my first attempt at a recruiting process – interviews and all. At 20, I was already learning to write project proposals and edit budgets. At 21, I got to experience an international climate conference and manage our entire social media strategy surrounding it. At 22, I got to have many more attempts at recruiting and helping grow our communications department. Very few other work environments would have entrusted me with such opportunities and responsibilities. I will carry these lessons with me throughout my entire professional career, and in my private life as well. 

A thank you is in order

I cannot reflect on these past three years without gratitude. YEE has allowed me to grow only insofar as I was inspired – and boy, I was surrounded by inspirational people. Firstly, a thank you to Nathan Méténier who took me under his wing as I joined as a volunteer and shared his dream of the Advocacy Working Group with me. From that first generation of the AWG with 6 volunteers, we are now working with over 10 volunteers on 9 portfolios and multiple fully-funded projects. Nathan has always been someone with a vision and the right amount of faith and optimism to make that happen. Thank you to Tetiana Stadnyk, who was Secretary General during the majority of my time at YEE, and whose steadfast and gentle leadership I hope to emulate one day. Thank you to Pegah, the new SecGen, for her playful comments and for always driving us to aim higher. Thank you to Eva, for making communications fun even during each 10AM Monday this past year. And thank you to Paola, Anna, Emma, Agnes, Clara and so many more names I cannot list – people whose energy and friendship was a very meaningful part of my time at YEE!

How does the story end?

I started out at YEE as a summer volunteer in 2020, learning how to use Zoom and being introduced to the huge world of environmental advocacy, as the Covid crisis kept spreading and I was stuck in my bedroom. I had only just finished my first year of university, half of it online and had no idea where I was headed. The state of the world was ever-changing and scary. Now, I am in the first year of my master’s, fully dedicating myself to studying environmental policy, hoping to specialise in environmental migration and climate adaptation strategies. Now, I have worked part-time for YEE for a year and a half, still behind a screen but thankfully with multiple occasions to have met my colleagues in person. The state of the world is still scary. The temperatures are getting hotter – I saw not a single drop of snow this winter and watched the fields drain of colour as they became brittle from the heat waves this summer. There is still a lot of work to do. As I leave YEE, I will hopefully use everything I have learned and apply it to new horizons and challenges. I can’t wait to see what else the youth environmental movement will get up to.

Written by Chloé

3 Billion Trees – Can the EU do it? ​

12.1.2023

Without a doubt, trees are incredibly important to our natural environment - they provide crucial roles in various ecosystems, are...

Read More

COP27 Reflections – Chloé

7.12.2022

Trying to gather my thoughts on COP has been a challenging task. Firstly, it goes without saying that I am...

Read More

A critical look at footprint compensation | Article

7.10.2022

Read More

More To Explore

YEE News


Reflections on INC-5: A Delayed Milestone, not a Failure

This session was supposed to be the “end of the beginning,” when the world would step out with the first-ever global plastic treaty, which did not happen. However, calling INC-5 a failure would overlook the complexities of negotiating and treaty-making and the leap forward that took place at INC-5.

YEE News


Why we left X

Today, we’re leaving X as an act of solidarity and a commitment to our values. This platform no longer aligns with our mission for transparency, equity, and sustainability.

YEE News


Czech-speaking researcher​

We are seeking a Czech-speaking researcher based in the Czech Republic to contribute to the ELY project’s implementation and evaluation in Czechia.

YEE News


COP29 Delegation reflection

Our delegation to COP29 has returned with a critical reflection. In this article, we share our insights on navigating the highs and lows of COP29, highlighting the challenges of amplifying youth voices, advocating for vulnerable communities, and pushing for a more just and equitable climate future. Read on for our full reflection and vision for the way forward.

YEE News


Reflections on INC-5: A Delayed Milestone, not a Failure

This session was supposed to be the “end of the beginning,” when the world would step out with the first-ever global plastic treaty, which did not happen. However, calling INC-5 a failure would overlook the complexities of negotiating and treaty-making and the leap forward that took place at INC-5.

YEE News


Why we left X

Today, we’re leaving X as an act of solidarity and a commitment to our values. This platform no longer aligns with our mission for transparency, equity, and sustainability.

Have questions? Get in touch!



Risks & Opportunities of the REPowerEU​ | Workshop

Risks & Opportunities of the REPowerEU

How to align the REPowerEU plan, and its implementation at EU countries level, with the protection of nature and the empowerment of citizens and communities?

Risks & Opportunities of the REPowerEU​

How to align the REPowerEU plan, and its implementation at EU countries level, with the protection of nature and the empowerment of citizens and communities?

Practical information

  • When

    Thursday 2nd March at 15:30 CET

  • Where

    Online

  • How

    Register your interest

Share This Event









Are you interested in learning about the challenges and opportunities related to the review of FF55 files and the RepowerEU?

 
Join our workshops with Cosimo Tansini, Policy Officer for Renewable Energy at the European Environmental Bureau! We will discuss the current challenges affecting the EU energy system and in particular the role of the REPowerEU plan in this crisis.
 

About the expert

Cosimo TansiniCosimo Tansini works in the EEB’s Climate and Energy team. He focuses on renewable energy and related EU policies, especially in the framework of the PAC 2.0 project. Prior to joining the EEB, he worked in the Lombardy Region’s government, focusing on electric mobility and energy efficiency, and at the University of Milan, where he was in charge of managing research projects in the field of agriculture and climate.

He holds a Master’s degree in political science from the University of Pavia, Italy.

 

Did you miss this webinar? Watch it now!

Have questions? Get in touch!



Other upcoming events

EU Emissions Trading System & Fit for 55 Workshop & Fit for 55​ | Workshop

EU Emissions Trading System & Fit for 55

How will the review of the EU ETS Directive align with the EU target set out in the European Climate Law to reduce net GHG emissions by 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels?

EU Emissions Trading System & Fit for 55

How will the review of the EU ETS Directive align with the EU target set out in the European Climate Law to reduce net GHG emissions by 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels?

Practical information

  • When

    Friday 24th Februry at 17h CET

  • Where

    Online

  • How

    Register your interest

Share This Event









Are you interested in knowing more about the FF55 under a legal perspective?

 
Join our workshops with Manolis Kotzampasakis, PhD candidate at the University of Groningen! You will learn why access to justice is essential in climate laws and link it to the current advocacy work of EU NGOs.
 

About the expert

Manolis Kotzampasakis (1994) is a lawyer, admitted to the Athens Bar Association in Greece, and a PhD candidate at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. He is also a visiting lecturer at the Federal University of Minas Gerais in Brazil. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Athens and an LL.M. degree in Energy and Climate Law (cum laude) from the University of Groningen. He has worked at law firms specializing in the areas of environmental, energy and health law, as well as at the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) committee of the European Parliament. He currently researches the law and economics dimensions of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping, with a focus on the inclusion of maritime transport in the EU Emissions Trading System. His previous research on EU and US carbon markets received the award for the Best Energy Law Master’s Thesis in the Netherlands (2017-2020) by the Dutch Energy Law Association.

 

Did you miss this webinar? Watch it now!

Have questions? Get in touch!



Other upcoming events

,

Introducing Alex | Showcasing the Unheard

I'm reassured about the efforts to protect nature

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of YEE.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of YEE.

Contents

Learn more about the project

Share this article









Alex is a 22-year-old Cypriot-Greek activist who became passionate about environmental protection after witnessing forest fires near his home and the subsequent destruction of the ecosystems. Alex is currently involved in an initiative fighting the Energy Charter Treaty, which allows fossil fuel companies to sue governments that shut down their operations.

 

Tell us a bit about yourself. Who’s Alex?

My name is Alex and I am 22 years old and I am Cypriot born, Greek raised. 

Where did your journey in environmental activism start?

Growing up, I lived outside of Athens in a very forested suburb. Forests are very vulnerable to forest fires in the summer, here in Greece. There would be a forest fire almost every year in areas near my home. As I was growing up I remember witnessing the destruction of these ecosystems. My father would take me to these places and would be very moved by what was happening, seeing the lively environment around us disappear. 

The fires happened a lot because of arson, but recognising how climate change makes them more likely is important. I think that this is what made me understand that human activities can have a significant impact on the environment around us from a young age. I became quite passionate whenever there was an event such as an attempt to reforest an area. We would go together with my school and I was keen to join any cleaning activities in the forest as well.

I also tried encouraging my friends to go and then I got involved in the school committees trying to make the school as active as possible in these areas. This is how I first got into it and then went to university. And it skyrocketed there when I saw more opportunities. 

I was very lucky to go to university in the UK. There were many student groups there that were involved in advocacy in making the university campus more sustainable. There was, for example, a group that would run and pick up trash, it’s called plugging and they would go running every week. 

I was involved with them, as well as a campaign that was focused on removing the bank Barclays from the university campus, as it is a major fossil fuel project financer. So as I was getting more and more opportunities, I really seized them as they were about things that really interested me. 

“Environmental protection, sustainability and not only environmental but also social causes helped me to see how we can come together to act and advocate for change.”

As the years passed, I felt like I got more and more stimuli that made me more and more involved. And I really appreciate that I’ve been able to see all the stimuli and I have had the time to invest in all of this.

What was your favourite project to work on?

During my time in the UK, I had made this friend, Marta. One day she contacted me and told me, Alex, I need someone to help me with the Warwick Food Cooperative. Could you come and give me a hand? And I had no idea what this Warwick Food Cooperative was. And I was already a student there for one year. 

The Warwick Food Cooperative was an initiative comprised of volunteers who where you could volunteer. They would purchase food in bulk from this organic, ethical, vegan distributor and would sell it for the same price as its cost!

When you get something in bulk, like 30 kilos of almonds, the price per kilo is lower. Then, it would be very affordable as well as environmentally friendly and healthy. The food would also come in big paper bags so people would come with their containers to buy food.

Therefore, it also reduces pollution from packaging. It was nice because it was led by volunteers and it was a cooperative. There were no managers. It was a completely horizontal system. We would have shifts together with other people, which made it fun to be on the shifts. And it was just a very nice atmosphere. We formed a beautiful group. We bonded and there would be so many customers that would come every time. Apart from these products, we also had a collaboration with local farmers who would bring vegetable boxes with their seasonal produce for only five or 10 pounds. 

You would get this vegetable box with what’s been grown literally a few miles away. We also worked with a bakery that operates in the city near our university. It was a social enterprise where refugee women baked bread. So apart from the food cooperative itself, it managed to connect us with the local community and also the marginalised community like the refugee women, as well as the local farmers. It created a platform for the community to become bigger and share its produce. It would only operate once a week on Thursdays, but it would do so much good and would give many smiles.

How do you feel about the engagement of young people in these kinds of activities in the UK compared to Greece?

I can see massive differences. And I feel like if I did not have the opportunity to go study in the UK, I would be much more limited in knowing what the possibilities are. I’ve mostly been active in the university environment. Specifically, the university environment that I was in, which is the UK and then the Netherlands. And it’s completely different compared to the experience of the people I know in Greece. 

There are not that many student initiatives created around sustainability in Greece. The universities in Greece do not have large campuses and don’t offer the same social experience. While in the UK, where you do pay a lot at the same time, it’s great as there is so much space and activities from a very organised student union. There were I think 12 or 13 sustainability-related societies in the university. They would each do their type of work, completely voluntarily. 

This was really great. There was much better infrastructure and opportunities to engage with such activities. At the same time, I think it’s also probably related to how society and maybe the economy work in more developed countries. Things run more smoothly and you don’t have to worry that much about whether you’ll be able to make enough money and live securely. And that’s where there is more space for sustainability initiatives to appear. Maybe it’s also part of the culture here, that people do not engage in these activities as much, but the economy definitely also plays a role. 

I don’t think there could be a food cooperative in a Greek university or even a student group that would organise itself to pick up trash. And sadly, there are not many things that you see here happening, but I wish for them to be here as well.

And I hope that they do appear in the following years as I feel that once they appear somewhere, these things spread into more countries as well.

What is your activism in Greece focused on?

There’s this treaty called the Energy Charter Treaty. A French NGO had a research led by a person called Mathilde Dubre and she found out that this treaty inhibits states from taking climate action because, in a few words, this treaty allows fossil fuel companies to sue governments if the government announces that they will shut their operations down.

Lawsuits appear that have to do with a lot of money and they are in private courts, not transparent at all. Therefore we don’t know what happens and how the decisions are made. But we know that a lot of money, in terms of billions of Euros, has already been awarded to fossil fuel companies through lawsuits. Of course, governments knowing that they will have to pay fossil fuel companies don’t want to announce that they will shut them down. 

So we have more fossil fuels, we have more emissions, we have more negative impacts on the climate. From the French NGO’s research, they found out that a possible way to combat this could cost a lot of money.

They joined forces with a law firm called Baldon Lawyers and with a French activist influencer, Camille Etienne, and they basically decided to try to find young people who have been affected by climate change because they would form a very good basis to claim in a court of human rights. 

So they chose the European Court of Human Rights and we are five people involved there. I got involved in this because of the forest fires that have been affecting my region. In 2021 in particular two forest fires were very close to my house and we had to evacuate our home. It was terrible, there was smoke everywhere, traffic, people trying to flee and panic and you didn’t know if you were going to be able to come back to your house and what was going to be left there. So I took a picture of my room and I took some of my belongings and I left. Luckily it was all intact, my family’s home was intact but the fire stopped about 200 meters from our house. 

Now we are in a situation where anywhere there are homes that’s where the firefighters focus on. It’s a bit ironic I guess to see how then if you go up a mountain next to my house you can see it’s all burned until where the houses start and that’s where there are trees left.

This lawsuit gave me the voice to represent the entire community here that is endangered by forest fires. It made a big impact as many media sources like Le Monde, The Guardian, and Euracative, shared articles about it, talking about five young people targeting an investment treaty because it’s quite a legal novelty to act in such a way.

There has never been a connection made with an investment treaty violating human rights. We are currently waiting for the court to decide on what is going to happen with this case and see the impact it has made. French politicians have also quoted it, encouraging the French president to withdraw from the treaty.

There is a channel that makes documentaries, it is called Arte. I think it’s a German-French channel. They created a documentary about climate loss and they featured our case too. It was a very nice opportunity that the journalists were interested in coming here. 

They visited me in my home and I showed them the burned area and I explained what has been happening in the past years and what I hope to achieve with the case. We hope that states withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty because the court says that it does violate human rights by making states not act on climate change. So hopefully it would remove this barrier to acting on climate change. I’m very happy that I’ve been able to use my own experience in my local community, in the place where I grew up as I feel so strongly about the nature that is around here. It is the same nature that people feel like is disappearing because of the effects of climate change. 

The documentary was a very nice visual representation of the situation and hopefully, many people can watch it and see what is happening. I feel like it also puts the specific area into the spotlight. Although it has been all around the media that the entire Greece is burning, sometimes it’s nice to just hear a person’s story about how you see it changing over the years. 

What keeps you driven?

I think a very important thing for me is that from a young age, I’ve felt nature in my heart and I have felt like I am in the heart of nature. Being very close to it and also being lucky enough to grow up in a place that is surrounded by forest. I could see everything changing throughout the seasons, the massive pine trees around and all the different animals and the sounds. I felt like I was a part of it.

“Witnessing the forest fires destroying everything felt like one moment you see and you hear and you smell and you feel all this nature around you and the next moment it’s gone and everything is black and smells like burnt material and there are ashes everywhere.”

I think this was a very strong image and I’ve seen this situation taking place all around Athens throughout these past years. There is barely any forest left at this point. After this summer we have even more fires here and I think this situation has made me understand how human activities can have such destructive implications on nature. 

It also comes from my family’s belief that humans are destroying nature and from a very young age teaching me about how we need to protect it. I had these ideas for a long time and since then they have become a priority for me. 

Although I think most people do not understand, I’m reassured about the efforts to protect nature and how necessary it is to protect nature, to ultimately protect us.

Meeting other people who are engaged has been extremely good for me. For example, when I started being passionate about veganism, I remember the different vegans I met and the different things I learned from them. 

And it was a really lovely experience, every person adding something in your heart and brain that you can apply. Or any activist that I have met, I feel like they have given me a lesson. I hope that I can also be such a person for activists to come, activists in the making. If you give a voice and listen to an activist, if you give them a platform, the ideas get out and they are extremely important to be out there. For the sake of sustainability, for the sake of the world, for it to continue being what it is, or to be better than what it is. 

And I have appreciated it a lot whenever I’ve encountered people with a big smile who work for the environment, they are just huge motivational inspirations. 

What would be your message to the young people who want to get involved out there?

Don’t be afraid to take the step to get involved. Very often we might see a group doing something, an initiative, but maybe we are alone and we don’t want to go there alone and participate. We would feel better going with a friend, but then a friend doesn’t have time. So I would say: put yourself out there. Environments that have to do with environmental causes attract very friendly people. 

I also remember myself being younger and being very scared and shy. If I had to go somewhere alone, I just wouldn’t do it. I always wanted to find someone to go with. But at this point, I just go, I don’t mind if I’m alone or not. Once you go there, everything will flow more easily and you will sooner or later, get integrated into it. 

The destruction of the environment is happening all around us now. So we need to act as fast as possible. And the best time was yesterday. And if not yesterday, right now. That shows the urgency of how important it is. 

Once you take this step and get involved, you will also be grateful for giving yourself the chance to meet new people and work on something you love.

Other interviews


, ,

SWITCH Networking event in Prague

S.W.I.T.C.H. networking event in Prague​

Learn about sustainable entrepreneurship and civil societies

Saturday 11 February 2023 from 15.00

Register

The goal of the event is to promote the work done in the SWITCH project, to showcase the work of the nine participants who finished the course and to gather and strengthen the cooperation of organisations, civil society organisations, movements and party-political organisations, as well as participants who are interested in this topic.
 

Agenda

After the presentation from participants of the SWITCH project, we will be holding an excellent opportunity to network with NGOs in Prague, and people interested in sustainability. In an ‘organisation fair format’, you will have the chance to represent your organisation, the work you do, upcoming opportunities, or any other thing you wish.

15:00 – 16:10 Getting to know each other & introduction to the SWITCH project
16:10 – 16:30 Break
16:30 – 17:30 Organisations Fair in Prague
17:30 – 19:00 Cocktail & Networking

What is the Organisations’ fair?

In an ‘organisation fair format’, you will have the chance to meet different NGOs and civil societies, learn about their work, and upcoming opportunities, or how could you get involved.

Organisations that confirmed their attendance:

🟡 YEE (the organiser)
🟡 The Green Project (S.W.I.T.C.H. alumni)
🟡 Tiimiakatemia
🟡 Ekokul z.s.
🟡 Volt Czechia
🟡 42 Prague
🟡 Genesis
🟡 Oikos International
🟡 Uniting Bridge SNGO
🟡 ESN Czechia

What is the SWITCH project?

SWITCH stands for Sustainability & Waste: Innovation, Training and Community Hub. During the training, participants developed a sustainable business project from scratch, together with the support of YEE and the rest of the participants, becoming part of a like-minded international community.

Practical information

  • When

    Saturday 11 February 2023, from 15.00

  • Where

    In the Green Innovation Academy, located in Vinohradská 2577/178, ground floor 130 00, Prague 3 – Vinohrady

  • How

    Register your interest

lucia

If you have any questions,

feel free to contact the project coordinator Lucía at lucia@yeenet.eu or via the form below.
















, ,

Call for Organisational training | Showcasing the Unheard

Call for Organisational training

We believe that the representation of diverse voices in the environmental youth movement is the key to good policymaking. (Under)representation of young people from rural communities, minorities and vulnerable groups affects the design, implementation and effectiveness of policies. Facing the climate emergency, we want to make sure that those who feel its consequences the most have space in decision-making and know that their voice matters. With this project, we want to engage with young people locally, while empowering and connecting youth internationally.

Online Training to Central and Eastern Europe (youth-led NGOs or youth groups in Central and Eastern Europe with priority towards Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania) with access to a facility/venue to work with marginalised youth on the local level; already working with marginalized communities with limited capacity/knowledge, or with a strategy/ strong vision for working with marginalized communities, able to assign at least one employee/volunteer to participate in the training course and lead the sub-granted project.

This training is for you if:

🟡 You are between the ages of 16 – 30

🟡 Your organisation is from Central or Eastern Europe
🟡  You want to extend your capacity in terms of working with marginalised communities
🟡  You believe in diversity and inclusion and you would like to do something to make your local community more inclusive and environmentally aware.

🟡  You are already working or plan to work with marginalised communities and are searching for support or guidance in your efforts.

At the training, you will:

🟣 Discuss the different types of disadvantaged communities present in our local regions that can be target groups for future projects and cooperation

🟣 Work together to understand how to better integrate disadvantaged communities in the decision making process of projects as well as how to shape projects and events around their needs

🟣 Develop your understanding of the importance of integration and environmental activism
🟣 Discuss possible project topics, structure, dead-lines, and future sub-granting availability.

After the training:

Participants of the training course will get an opportunity to apply for a sub-grant to develop the capacity of their organisation to work with young people with fewer opportunities.

Practical information

  • When

    1st February 2023 and 3rd February 2023

  • Where

    Online

  • How

    Register your interest before 28th January

This training course is part of the Showcasing the Unheard project.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us:
















, ,

3 Billion Trees – Can the EU do it? ​

3 Billion Trees - Can the EU do it?

What is the 3 Billion Tree Pledge?

3 billion trees – a big number, a big promise. As part of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, the European Union committed to planting 3 billion additional trees by 2030. Without a doubt, trees are incredibly important to our natural environment – they provide crucial roles in various ecosystems, are home to many diverse species, absorb carbon, improve human health and well-being and serve essential roles in flood control and water filtration. This EU pledge plans to do just that. By increasing forest cover in the EU, “in full respect of ecological principles: the right tree species in forests, agricultural areas, urban and peri-urban areas and along infrastructure corridors”. Is this promise too good to be true?

The forest expansion rate in the EU has been slow in recent years, and a goal of 3 billion additional trees would double the total forest expansion rate in Europe between 2005 and 2020. It is currently estimated that in the EU, 300 million trees are grown annually. Currently, as of October 2022, the activity under the pledge has resulted in 6,787,146 new trees have been planted, carried out in all 27 countries with help from 28 organisations such as Land Life and ReforestAction. 

Afforestation – a solution for the biodiversity and climate crisis?

Afforestation and reforestation are not new policies, humans have been planting trees for centuries. There is a consensus that trees and forests are worthwhile and there is a policy to support it. The EU itself has seen the afforestation of approximately one million hectares of agricultural land between 1994-1999, and 700 hectares between 2000 and 2007. Many countries have afforestation policies in place. Canada’s Forest 2020 Plantation Development and Assessment Initiative, not dissimilar to this pledge, saw the plantation of 6000 hectares of forest and its success encouraged the government’s investment of $3.16 billion to plant 2 billion trees in ten years in 2020. Famously, the African Union put in place the Great Green Wall, an ambitious policy to help combat desertification, the AU has been planting a wall of trees to cover 100 million hectares of land and absorbs 250 million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere. Other approaches have been taken – in 1981, China put in place a law which requires children over the age of 11 to plant a tree per year. 

What is the impact on biodiversity…? 

What does planting trees do? Firstly, forests are important loci for biodiversity, representing often dense ecosystems with diverse plants and animals. Forests are thought to be important habitats, “home to 80% of the world’s biodiversity on land”. Planting more trees in forested areas or reforesting struggling forest ecosystems can have many important impacts. Forests are important habitats and maintaining their integrity through reforestation can ensure that wildlife remains in the region and isn’t forced to relocate. Increased forest density and diversity have also been linked to an increase in species richness for fungi and soil invertebrates. Moreover, tree plantation in urban areas (included in the 3 Billion Trees Pledge) has been studied as a positive act that attracts and shelters wildlife species, particularly birds and insects, and provides shade.

Forests are also key for soil quality and resilience. A lack of trees has been seen to cause a sensibility to soil erosion. Trees’ overlapping and interconnected roots provide a structural role in the topsoil layer of land. This topsoil layer can erode (runoff) without trees in place, which in turn risks the land becoming infertile and inhospitable to the plantation. Moreover, afforestation has been found to improve watersheds, which are key for water supply. 

.. and for the climate?

The benefits don’t stop there – trees can help us in the fight against climate change. Carbon sequestration is a bit of a buzzword in the environmental sphere but it shouldn’t be dismissed. Restoring forests and increasing generally the number of plants on our earth has the potential to absorb and store large amounts of carbon – these are known as carbon sinks. Through photosynthesis, carbon dioxide is absorbed by trees, and they in turn release oxygen. The absorbed carbon is turned to sugar which is used in the wood, branches and roots, meaning that it remains in the standing tree. Even once the tree dies, it takes years for the carbon to break down, apart from when leaves decompose and when carbon is released more quickly. The age of the tree impacts its carbon sequestration aptitude, with middle-aged trees being the most effective and young trees the least effective due to size. Overall, uneven-aged forests are the best at carbon capture – meaning that planting trees in strategic places would allow for uneven-aged forests and increase the potential for carbon sequestration. 

For this reason, afforestation and reforestation are seen as one of the great ‘natural solutions’ for climate mitigation. Policymakers believe these forms of ecosystem services are probable to be of rising importance and relevance due to their impact both for mitigation and adaptation to climate change, and general benefits to our environment. This potential has been recognised internationally with the Paris Agreement emphasising the importance of carbon sinks in order to achieve a balance between emissions and removals. Carbon sinks are a key part of EU environmental policy with recent targets set to increase carbon sinks by 15% compared to today in the land use and forestry sector. 

Overall, the pledge could be very powerful in this regard: 3 billion trees covering 2 million ha could remove up to 4 million tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere already by 2030, and as much as 15 million tonnes by 2050, according to the European Commission. The decision to encourage tree planting, therefore, seems a logical one, both in terms of benefits for climate and biodiversity.

The right tree, in the right place, for the right reason

However, as with most environmental solutions, it is not as clear-cut as it seems. 

Simply planting trees isn’t a be-all and end-all solution to our dual crisis.

Virginijus Sinkevičius, the EU’s environment commissioner, commented: “That’s our promise. To plant three billion trees. The right trees, in the right place, for the right reason” – this second half is essential, we can’t simply plant any tree anywhere and assume it is beneficial. It must be done properly – is the 3 billion tree pledge ready for that? 

The pledge, in all its ambition, has limitations. With 8 years left, there are still 2.993 billion trees to be planted and yet, given the voluntary nature of the pledge, it is unclear how the number will be reached. The pledge came along with a roadmap which primarily relies on monitoring through the Forest Information System for Europe and the creation of a new app MapMyTree so citizens can upload and monitor their trees and progress. Anyone can plant a tree – but it is essential that native tree species to the area are planted, and that it is done with care and understanding of the surrounding ecosystem. 

Avoiding Monocultures 

The pledge is ambitious – asking for huge amounts of trees to be planted – but it cannot be stressed enough that monocultures cannot be a solution to short-cut to the end-goal of 3 billion trees.  Monocultures were conceptualised as a way to produce as much wood “in as little time as possible and, technically in the simplest manner” in the 18th and 19th centuries in Europe as a response to timber shortages. Their simplicity is at odds with the necessary complexity of biodiversity. In setting high targets for tree plantation, there is the potential that concerned actors would cut corners and plant large plantations of similar species – not a sustainable approach to forestry. As Friends of the Earth International, World Rainforest Movement and FERN, said monoculture tree plantations done in the guise of carbon sinks would “have to be large-scale and thus even more destructive — are exactly the opposite of “sustainable development”. Ecosystem uniformity means that there is a lack of genetic diversity as well as typically close planting, making monoculture plantations vulnerable to pests and diseases. 

Where’s the money? 

Another issue with the pledge is funding. The reality is that to achieve such an ambitious goal as 3 billion trees, there will be a need for monetary incentives. In the EU’s public consultation on the issue, a main key challenge in terms of planting additional trees was identified: “financial resources/loss of farmland value after conversion to forest land”, an issue raised by 62.88% of respondents. It seems that this pledge is relying on the use of pre-existing EU and national funds and monetary mechanisms such as Finland’s Metso Programme which pays private forest owners to keep some of their lands for biodiversity purposes. In the EU, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) helps provide financial support for forests and forest management through national Rural Development Programmes, though the use of these funds has not been achieved to their fullest extent, perhaps due to a lack of awareness of how to apply or implement forest-based adaptation activities. From 2014 to 2020, 27% of these CAP forestry measures went to afforestation.

Unfortunately, we cannot simply hope that 3 billion trees will be planted by pure goodwill and altruism – as Carlos Manuel Rodríguez, Costa Rica’s minister for the environment and energy, acknowledged in relation to Costa Rica’s afforestation approach: “we have learned that the pocket is the quickest way to the heart ”. Instead, this policy must be paired with robust financial support, aid and access.

Is there a risk of greenwashing in all of this? 

Tree planting has become perceived as an easy solution to climate change due to its carbon sequestration potential – it has become the token action in order to offset carbon emissions through offset schemes, a form of commercialised climate mitigation which has been often awarded the label of greenwashing. Oil and gas companies have invested in tree-planting to offset emissions, such as Total announcing a $100 million investment in 2019. Tree-planting has been picked up by politicians across the political spectrum due to its feasibility, with even right-wing U.S. former president Donald Trump supporting the proposition of a ‘Trillion Trees Act’. This republican move was recognised as a way to satisfy voter demand for climate action without having to curtail emissions and the interests of the fossil fuel lobby. This encapsulates the key issue at hand: planting trees and carbon sequestration shouldn’t be a replacement for mitigation measures and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Indeed, Greenpeace described this EU initiative as simply “feel good”, that overall “lack(s) real action to restore forests and expand clean energy”, representative of “not only (…) a dangerous distraction from the climate crisis, but represents logging industry greenwashing.” Principally, Sini Eräjää, Greenpeace EU forest campaigner, summarised it as: “the potential climate and biodiversity benefits to planting trees are limited, but the risks of greenwashing are endless“. Overall, it is clear, the 3 billion trees pledge should be understood as one policy tool amongst many to promote tree planting and help Europe’s climate and biodiversity issues. Indeed, it is simply one of the measures of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.

To plant or not to plant?

2022 has ended, leaving 7 years for the implementation of the 3 billion trees goal and yet the structure in place to support it and allow for its long-term success seems to be lacking. Overall, as was mentioned in reaction to the press release for the 3 Billion Trees Pledge, “in terms of numbers alone, the pledge has raised eyebrows”. 3 billion trees is a very ambitious goal, and we are currently only a tiny fraction of the way there. Hopefully the remaining 2.993 billion trees to be planted will indeed be done with the right trees in the right place with the right support.











Introducing Vladislava | Showcasing the Unheard

Introducing Vladislava
Showcasing the Unheard

I think that we will definitely cope with climate change, simply because we have no other choice.

Meet Vlada, an 18 years old activist from St. Petersburg, Russia. Vlada coordinates Fridays for Future Russia and is especially interested in the melting of permafrost in Russia, the fate of indigenous peoples, ecofeminism, food security, and a just transition. She studies ecology at a Russian state university and dreams of doing a master’s degree in climate change in Europe, as this subject is not available anywhere in Russia.

Vlada started to learn about the problem of climate change at the age of 16 and soon after started her digital climate action campaigns. Inspired by Greta Thunberg, she understood the importance of this topic. As an activist in Russia, however, there are serious security concerns, which is why she was reluctant to start big activism at first. But then Vlada got to know Arshak Makichyan and other climate activists in Russia, whose examples inspired her to not be afraid and fight for our planet and future. The example of Arshak’s action, who organised a school strike for the climate every Friday for more than 40 weeks, as well as that of other activists shows how great a role young climate activists play in Russia. Unfortunately, they have to reckon with the consequences of their actions, which can even lead to them being sent to prison, as happened to Arshak, who ended up there for a few days.

Another main problem Vlada is faced with in her activism is the negative propaganda against FFF from Russia.

“People believe in propaganda that often insults us or writes pseudo-scientific articles, and many people are skeptical of us.”

The amount of hate, these obstacles and difficulties led to a lot of people leaving the Fridays For Future movement – they are burnt out and lack the energy to continue fighting. And the pandemic has not helped: since 2020, campaigning has become even more difficult. Unapproved protests of more than one person are generally forbidden, as are most forms of protest before the age of 18.
Vlada told us: “Even a single picket is illegal. We live in the absence of freedom of speech, and some activists of our movement have already been repressed. Therefore, each of our actions must be carefully considered and all consequences calculated, which is why our work is now almost paralyzed.”

A key aspect of Vlada’s activism is related to information sharing, as she believes that the things she reads and learns should also be shared with others. Especially in Russia, where people do not know much about climate change because there is barely any education about it in schools, this is crucial. At FFF, she reports that a multitude of topics has been discussed in the past, but she wants to shift focus to local topics in Russia now.

The topics she thinks are especially relevant are the consequences of Russian colonialism, how fossil fuel companies are destroying indigenous lands, and how the very existence of these peoples is threatened due to climate change. She hopes that by focusing on topics close to their hearts, more Russians will get involved and overcome their fears of acting.

“(…) in my opinion, it makes sense to talk more about the problems and consequences of the climate crisis specifically for Russia – but this doesn’t mean that we will engage in isolationism and ignore world problems. It’s just that what is happening in Russia is more closely perceived by our citizens, and we need to use this fact.”

To achieve a better world, Vlada sees negotiation as a key step to be taken. 

“It's terrible that adults still resolve their conflicts with
weapons and murder. It shouldn't be like this, we need solidarity and
the ability to unite.”

Furthermore, she states the importance of not buying fossil fuels from autocracies and dictatorships. She says the price to pay for “cheap” fossil fuels has now become apparent and that renewable energy sources can be seen as a guarantee of peace and justice.

The ongoing war on Ukraine is a very important topic for Vlada and with its onset, she has shifted the focus of her activism to anti-war but was not able to tell us more about it due to security concerns.

Vlada told us how drastically the war has changed her perspective:
“In the past, I used to see it as my goal to do everything to accelerate Russia’s compliance with the terms of the Paris Agreement and climate adaptation. But now, after the start of the war, I don’t know what my future and the future of Russia will be like. I want the war to end as soon as possible. I want all those responsible to be punished. I want to live in peace and tranquility, not in fear of repression and default.”

Despite everything that is happening, Vlada continues to be optimistic. She says:
“I think that we will definitely cope with climate change, simply because we have no other choice. It will be a very difficult path, but in the end, goodness and freedom will win. There are a lot of brave, strong and honest people in the world who are ready to fight for our common future. And while they exist, I believe in victory over all problems. (..) You may experience pain and anxiety about everything that happens in the world, especially if your country is at war or repressions. But I know that while we fight, goodness will live at least in our hearts, and in the end we will be able to spread it to the whole world. Some situations may seem hopeless, but we are alive, and freedom is alive with us. I hug everyone who is feeling bad now, who has lost motivation to fight for our future. Goodness will win, and goodness is you.”

Other interviews







COP27 Reflections – Eva

There are many things that are wrong with COPs

The most privileged people in the world gather to discuss, not change the status quo in a very artificial setting. I was approached by one of the organisers to answer the question “How will COP help with solving climate change?” And the truth is, I really cannot see how. What is the purpose of the Green Zone other than take a selfie #blessed? This massive event has nothing to do with change, nor climate.
 
This is what I wrote down on my first day of COP27 after visiting the Green Zone.

After spending the week at the conference, hearing some great speeches, seeing some great work from experts, and observing many protests, I might hesitantly agree that it is actually our best shot at doing anything about the climate crisis on the global scale. By saying this, I am however not trying to excuse the greenwashing, the inaction, the obvious business interests, the propaganda of the organisers. I merely want to acknowledge that the scale on which we need to agree to act is massive, not to mention that everybody comes with the “what can we get from this” mindset which makes the agreement that more difficult.

There are many things that are wrong with COPs and which should be improved. However,  we, the civil society, should not give up and hand this conference to private companies and lobbyists trying to influence politicians for their own gains, even though it brings so much frustration.

To conclude, on one hand, my perspective slightly changed after a full week in Sharm El-Sheikh, however I still stand by the first sentence that I wrote down – The most privileged people in the world gather to discuss, not change the status quo in a very artificial setting. With that in mind, we will keep showing up and keep pushing for change, even if it is measured in steps not miles.

COP27 Reflections - Together for implementation?

The motto for this COP was “Together for Implementation” – but have we been able to pass it to action? And are the parties truly “together” in the face of the climate crisis?


Read Here